MBCE vs. FITZ
MBCE (Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. MBCE is passively managed, while FITZ is actively managed. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MBCE charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.
Performance
MBCE vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBCE
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -6.79%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FITZ
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $756.61K | $815.77K | $3.65M | |
| $704.30K | $864.91K | $1.01M |
MBCE vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBCE Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF | -7.47% |
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF | -2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBCE and FITZ is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBCE vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBCE vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBCE drawdown since its inception was -17.37%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -7.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBCE and FITZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBCE | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.37% | -7.37% | -10.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.08% | -3.28% | -8.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.11% | -4.01% | -2.10% |
Volatility
MBCE vs. FITZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBCE | FITZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.62% | 14.90% | +26.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.62% | 14.90% | +26.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.62% | 14.90% | +26.72% |
MBCE vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBCE has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBCE vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither MBCE nor FITZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MBCE and FITZ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for MBCE.
MBCE and FITZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for MBCE and 0.75% for FITZ.
Find the right allocation for MBCE and FITZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer