PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBBB vs. HODL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBBB vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBBB achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -25.27% return.


MBBB

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.32%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*

HODL

1D
-2.79%
1M
-18.34%
YTD
-25.27%
6M
-29.73%
1Y
-38.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBBB vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MBBB
VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF
0.43%7.64%3.84%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
-25.27%-6.42%99.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MBBB and HODL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBBB vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBBB
MBBB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

HODL
HODL Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBBB vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBBBHODLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

-0.89

+2.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

-1.23

+3.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.86

+0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

-0.79

+2.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.86

-1.36

+7.23

MBBB vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBBB and HODL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBBBHODLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

-0.89

+2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.30

-0.12

Drawdowns

MBBB vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBBB drawdown since its inception was -21.73%, smaller than the maximum HODL drawdown of -49.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBB and HODL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBBBHODLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.73%

-49.25%

+27.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-49.25%

+46.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-47.93%

+46.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-15.97%

+9.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

28.35%

-27.43%

Volatility

MBBB vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) is 1.52%, while VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that MBBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBBBHODLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

9.43%

-7.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

34.37%

-31.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

43.51%

-39.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

49.88%

-43.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.23%

49.88%

-43.65%

MBBB vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MBBB and HODL have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MBBB vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

MBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MBBB
VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF
5.08%4.99%4.93%4.51%3.22%2.29%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBBB and HODL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HODL has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to MBBB (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBBB dropped -21.73% vs HODL's -49.25%.

On 1-year performance, MBBB leads with 5.40% vs -38.56% for HODL. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, MBBB has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MBBB has performed better with a 5.40% return vs -38.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MBBB and HODL have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

MBBB has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 0.00% for HODL.

MBBB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while HODL is Cryptocurrency. MBBB tracks MVIS Moody's Analytics US BBB Corporate Bond Index, while HODL tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant.

MBBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBBB and HODL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer