MBBB vs. CLOI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI).

MBBB and CLOI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MBBB is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Moody's Analytics US BBB Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2020. CLOI is an actively managed fund by VanEck. It was launched on Jun 21, 2022.

Performance

MBBB vs. CLOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MBBB vs. CLOI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MBBB VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF	-0.48%	7.64%	3.68%	9.75%	-0.26%
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF	0.61%	5.84%	8.26%	8.95%	2.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBBB achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than CLOI's 0.61% return.

MBBB

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -1.86%
• YTD: -0.48%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 4.78%
• 3Y*: 5.48%
• 5Y*: 1.22%
• 10Y*: —

CLOI

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 6M: 1.94%
• 1Y: 5.39%
• 3Y*: 7.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBBB vs. CLOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBBB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOI's 0.40% expense ratio.

CLOI

VanEck CLO ETF

MBBB

VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF

Return for Risk

MBBB vs. CLOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBBB

MBBB Risk / Return Rank: 54
MBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
MBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
MBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 47
MBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 55

CLOI

CLOI Risk / Return Rank: 80
CLOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
CLOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CLOI Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CLOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
CLOI Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBBB vs. CLOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) and VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MBBB	CLOI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	1.30	-0.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	1.64	-0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.48	-0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	1.65	0.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.38	12.84	-7.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MBBB vs. CLOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBBB Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the CLOI Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBBB and CLOI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MBBB	CLOI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	1.30	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	2.68	-2.52

Correlation

The correlation between MBBB and CLOI is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MBBB vs. CLOI - Dividend Comparison

MBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than CLOI's 5.53% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MBBB VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF	4.99%	4.99%	4.93%	4.51%	3.22%	2.29%	0.19%
CLOI VanEck CLO ETF	5.53%	5.61%	6.71%	5.61%	2.23%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MBBB vs. CLOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBBB drawdown since its inception was -21.73%, which is greater than CLOI's maximum drawdown of -3.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBB and CLOI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBBB	CLOI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.73%	-3.25%	-18.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.98%	-3.25%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.86%	-0.13%	-1.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-0.19%	-6.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	0.42%	+0.50%

Volatility

MBBB vs. CLOI - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) has a higher volatility of 2.11% compared to VanEck CLO ETF (CLOI) at 0.45%. This indicates that MBBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBBB	CLOI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.11%	0.45%	+1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.86%	0.74%	+2.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.01%	4.16%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.35%	2.61%	+3.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.28%	2.61%	+3.67%