PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBBB vs. PAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MBBB vs. PAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) and PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MBBB vs. PAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MBBB
VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF
-0.48%7.64%3.68%5.09%
PAAA
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
0.99%5.37%7.47%3.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBBB achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than PAAA's 0.99% return.


MBBB

1D
0.65%
1M
-1.86%
YTD
-0.48%
6M
0.00%
1Y
4.78%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*

PAAA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.99%
6M
2.21%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MBBB vs. PAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBBB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PAAA's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

MBBB vs. PAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBBB
MBBB Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

PAAA
PAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBBB vs. PAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) and PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBBBPAAADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

4.03

-3.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.34

4.87

-3.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

2.94

-1.75

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

5.26

-3.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.38

43.72

-38.34

MBBB vs. PAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBBB Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the PAAA Sharpe Ratio of 4.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBBB and PAAA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBBBPAAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

4.03

-3.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

6.64

-6.47

Correlation

The correlation between MBBB and PAAA is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MBBB vs. PAAA - Dividend Comparison

MBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than PAAA's 5.48% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
MBBB
VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF
4.99%4.99%4.93%4.51%3.22%2.29%0.19%
PAAA
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
5.48%5.12%5.88%2.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MBBB vs. PAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBBB drawdown since its inception was -21.73%, which is greater than PAAA's maximum drawdown of -1.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBB and PAAA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MBBBPAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.73%

-1.04%

-20.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-1.04%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

0.00%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-0.02%

-7.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.12%

+0.80%

Volatility

MBBB vs. PAAA - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) has a higher volatility of 2.11% compared to PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) at 0.27%. This indicates that MBBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MBBBPAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.11%

0.27%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

0.39%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.01%

1.34%

+3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

1.00%

+5.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

1.00%

+5.28%