PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBBB vs. VCIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBBB vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBBB achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's 0.18% return.


MBBB

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.32%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*

VCIT

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.07%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
6.00%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
2.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBBB vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MBBB
VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF
0.43%7.64%3.68%9.75%-15.04%0.30%1.51%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.18%9.34%3.20%8.98%-13.98%-1.77%0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MBBB and VCIT is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

0.96

The correlation between MBBB and VCIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBBB vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBBB
MBBB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBBB vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBBBVCITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

1.50

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

2.22

-0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.27

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

2.08

-0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.86

6.95

-1.08

MBBB vs. VCIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the VCIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBBB and VCIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBBBVCITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.50

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.19

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.75

-0.57

Drawdowns

MBBB vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBBB drawdown since its inception was -21.73%, which is greater than VCIT's maximum drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBB and VCIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBBBVCITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.73%

-20.56%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-2.96%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.64%

-6.11%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.73%

-20.56%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-1.36%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-3.16%

-3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.88%

+0.04%

Volatility

MBBB vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF (MBBB) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) at 1.38%. This indicates that MBBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBBBVCITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

1.38%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

3.06%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

4.10%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.36%

6.61%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.23%

6.28%

-0.05%

MBBB vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBBB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MBBB vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison

MBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, more than VCIT's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBBB
VanEck Moody's Analytics BBB Corporate Bond ETF
5.08%4.99%4.93%4.51%3.22%2.29%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.80%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MBBB and VCIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MBBB has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to VCIT (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBBB dropped -21.73% vs VCIT's -20.56%.

On 5-year performance, VCIT leads with 1.22% vs 1.11% for MBBB. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VCIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VCIT has performed better with a 1.22% return vs 1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MBBB.

MBBB has the higher dividend yield at 5.08%, compared with 4.80% for VCIT.

MBBB tracks MVIS Moody's Analytics US BBB Corporate Bond Index, while VCIT tracks Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MBBB and 0.04% for VCIT.

VCIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBBB and VCIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer