MAR vs. ED
MAR (Marriott International, Inc.) and ED (Consolidated Edison, Inc.) are both stocks. MAR operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical), while ED operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, MAR returned 21.03%/yr vs 7.01%/yr for ED. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MAR vs. ED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAR achieves a 30.26% return, which is significantly higher than ED's 10.24% return. Over the past 10 years, MAR has outperformed ED with an annualized return of 21.03%, while ED has yielded a comparatively lower 7.01% annualized return.
MAR
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 14.20%
- YTD
- 30.26%
- 6M
- 35.28%
- 1Y
- 59.26%
- 3Y*
- 31.68%
- 5Y*
- 23.91%
- 10Y*
- 21.03%
ED
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 7.08%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- 7.01%
MAR vs. ED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 30.26% | 12.31% | 24.92% | 53.06% | -9.34% | 25.26% | -12.53% | 41.49% | -19.05% | 66.24% |
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 10.24% | 15.15% | 1.55% | -1.12% | 15.65% | 22.96% | -16.99% | 22.54% | -6.62% | 19.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAR and ED is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 1993 | 0.18 |
The correlation between MAR and ED shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (3 years) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MAR:
$12.66
ED:
$5.94
MAR:
31.80
ED:
18.13
MAR:
0.83
ED:
1.29
MAR:
3.78
ED:
2.27
MAR:
$21.73B
ED:
$17.22B
MAR:
$1.31B
ED:
$11.62B
MAR:
$3.81B
ED:
$8.47B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAR vs. ED — Risk / Return Rank
MAR
ED
MAR vs. ED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) and Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAR | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.08 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | 0.76 | +3.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.89 | 1.59 | +9.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAR vs. ED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAR drawdown since its inception was -75.59%, roughly equal to the maximum ED drawdown of -78.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAR and ED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAR | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.59% | -78.90% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.65% | -9.63% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.50% | -17.36% | -13.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.50% | -22.03% | -8.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.26% | -30.91% | -30.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.91% | +5.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -13.24% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.01% | 4.59% | +0.42% |
Volatility
MAR vs. ED - Volatility Comparison
Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) has a higher volatility of 6.92% compared to Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) at 5.98%. This indicates that MAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAR | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.92% | 5.98% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.94% | 12.27% | +7.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.32% | 16.65% | +9.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.84% | 18.79% | +10.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.90% | 21.01% | +11.89% |
Dividends
MAR vs. ED - Dividend Comparison
MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than ED's 3.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 3.23% | 3.42% | 3.72% | 3.56% | 3.32% | 3.63% | 4.23% | 3.27% | 3.74% | 3.25% | 3.64% | 4.05% |
MAR Marriott International, Inc. | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.86% | 0.87% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 0.95% | 1.39% | 1.42% |
Financials
MAR vs. ED - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marriott International, Inc. and Consolidated Edison, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MAR and ED have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAR has higher volatility (6.92%) compared to ED (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAR dropped -75.59% vs ED's -78.90%.
MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAR and ED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer