PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ED vs. NRG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


EDNRG
YTD Return6.03%50.21%
1Y Return0.54%152.24%
3Y Return (Ann)10.92%34.39%
5Y Return (Ann)5.96%17.94%
10Y Return (Ann)9.33%10.95%
Sharpe Ratio0.065.34
Daily Std Dev17.36%25.59%
Max Drawdown-74.02%-79.41%
Current Drawdown-1.34%0.00%

Fundamentals


EDNRG
Market Cap$32.13B$15.63B
EPS$7.21-$1.12
PE Ratio12.896.39
PEG Ratio2.552.40
Revenue (TTM)$14.66B$28.82B
Gross Profit (TTM)$7.69B$4.10B
EBITDA (TTM)$5.11B$282.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between ED and NRG is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ED vs. NRG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ED achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than NRG's 50.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ED has underperformed NRG with an annualized return of 9.33%, while NRG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.95% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
467.89%
938.65%
ED
NRG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Consolidated Edison, Inc.

NRG Energy, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ED vs. NRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ED
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ED, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ED, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.20
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ED, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ED, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ED, currently valued at 0.14, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.14
NRG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NRG, currently valued at 5.34, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.34
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NRG, currently valued at 5.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NRG, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.78
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NRG, currently valued at 4.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.40
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NRG, currently valued at 59.72, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0059.72

ED vs. NRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ED Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the NRG Sharpe Ratio of 5.34. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ED and NRG.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.06
5.34
ED
NRG

Dividends

ED vs. NRG - Dividend Comparison

ED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than NRG's 2.05% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
3.41%3.56%3.32%3.63%4.23%3.27%3.74%3.25%3.64%4.05%3.82%4.45%
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
2.05%2.92%4.40%3.02%3.20%0.30%0.30%0.42%1.92%4.93%2.00%1.57%

Drawdowns

ED vs. NRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ED drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, smaller than the maximum NRG drawdown of -79.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ED and NRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.34%
0
ED
NRG

Volatility

ED vs. NRG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) is 5.56%, while NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) has a volatility of 7.79%. This indicates that ED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.56%
7.79%
ED
NRG

Financials

ED vs. NRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Consolidated Edison, Inc. and NRG Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items