ED vs. NRG

In the year-to-date period, ED achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly lower than NRG's 87.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ED has underperformed NRG with an annualized return of 8.54%, while NRG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.34% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ED Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the NRG Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ED and NRG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ED's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than NRG's 1.73% yield.

The maximum ED drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, smaller than the maximum NRG drawdown of -79.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ED and NRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) is 4.89%, while NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) has a volatility of 9.02%. This indicates that ED experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Consolidated Edison, Inc. and NRG Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.