MAKX vs. NOBL
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL).
MAKX and NOBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAKX is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho Smart Factories Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2021. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. Both MAKX and NOBL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MAKX vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MAKX vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF | 3.72% | 21.63% | 8.27% | 26.03% | -26.41% | 3.91% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.32% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 11.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAKX achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 2.32% return.
MAKX
- 1D
- 4.38%
- 1M
- -7.27%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 44.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -6.79%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MAKX vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAKX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MAKX vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
MAKX
NOBL
MAKX vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAKX | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 0.41 | +0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 0.70 | +1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.09 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 0.54 | +2.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.61 | 1.89 | +5.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAKX | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 0.41 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.64 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between MAKX and NOBL is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MAKX vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
MAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than NOBL's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAKX ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.24% | 0.52% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Drawdowns
MAKX vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAKX drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAKX and NOBL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAKX | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.27% | -35.43% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.05% | -11.20% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.78% | -7.07% | -2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.18% | -3.45% | -13.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.71% | 3.18% | +2.53% |
Volatility
MAKX vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) has a higher volatility of 10.24% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.55%. This indicates that MAKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MAKX | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.24% | 3.55% | +6.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.72% | 8.06% | +13.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.34% | 15.24% | +17.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.03% | 14.39% | +13.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.03% | 16.59% | +11.44% |