MAGX vs. FNGS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MAGX (Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. MAGX is actively managed, while FNGS is passively managed. Over the past year, MAGX returned 33.21% vs 17.02% for FNGS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MAGX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.

Performance

MAGX vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a -8.69% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 6.79% return.

MAGX

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -16.06%
• YTD: -8.69%
• 6M: -7.45%
• 1Y: 33.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGS

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 4.25%
• 1Y: 17.02%
• 3Y*: 29.80%
• 5Y*: 19.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGX vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF	-8.69%	26.16%	82.41%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	6.79%	18.64%	32.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGX and FNGS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024	0.86

The correlation between MAGX and FNGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGX vs. FNGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAGX	FNGS
Financial Services	25.0%	10.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	28.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	59.9%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MAGX vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGX

MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 25
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGX vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGX	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	0.79	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	1.19	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.15	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.90	0.75	+0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.70	2.12	+0.58

MAGX vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGX and FNGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAGX vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGX	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.19%	-48.98%	-5.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.24%	-22.93%	-14.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.77%	-9.63%	-7.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.76%	-10.85%	-2.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.32%	8.05%	+4.27%

Volatility

MAGX vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) has a higher volatility of 12.35% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 8.74%. This indicates that MAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGX	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.35%	8.74%	+3.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.63%	17.19%	+13.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.70%	21.65%	+19.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.61%	30.10%	+23.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.61%	31.17%	+22.44%

MAGX vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGX vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF	2.24%	2.05%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGX and FNGS in my portfolio?

MAGX and FNGS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGX or FNGS?

MAGX has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to FNGS (8.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGX dropped -54.19% vs FNGS's -48.98%.

Which ETF is better, MAGX or FNGS?

On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 33.21% vs 17.02% for FNGS. On fees, FNGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGX or FNGS?

Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 33.21% return vs 17.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGX or FNGS?

FNGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MAGX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGX or FNGS?

MAGX has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.00% for FNGS.

What is the main difference between MAGX and FNGS?

MAGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FNGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MAGX and 0.58% for FNGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.