PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGX vs. YMAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGX vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a -6.68% return, which is significantly lower than YMAG's 0.05% return.


MAGX

1D
-3.00%
1M
-11.98%
YTD
-6.68%
6M
-7.79%
1Y
38.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YMAG

1D
-1.24%
1M
-4.55%
YTD
0.05%
6M
0.33%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGX vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAGX and YMAG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024

0.96

The correlation between MAGX and YMAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGX vs. YMAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MAGX
YMAG

Financial Services

25.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

MAGX
25.0%
YMAG
100.0%

Basic Materials

MAGX

-

YMAG

-

Communication Services

MAGX

-

YMAG

-

Consumer Cyclical

MAGX

-

YMAG

-

Consumer Defensive

MAGX

-

YMAG

-

Energy

MAGX

-

YMAG

-

Healthcare

MAGX

-

YMAG

-

Industrials

MAGX

-

YMAG

-

Real Estate

MAGX

-

YMAG

-

Technology

MAGX

-

YMAG

-

Utilities

MAGX

-

YMAG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGX vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

YMAG
YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGX vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGXYMAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.24

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.53

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.15

5.33

-2.19

MAGX vs. YMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the YMAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGX and YMAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGXYMAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

1.35

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.06

-0.31

Drawdowns

MAGX vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, which is greater than YMAG's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and YMAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGXYMAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.19%

-25.96%

-28.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.24%

-14.38%

-22.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.94%

-6.23%

-8.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.74%

-4.52%

-9.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.18%

4.13%

+8.05%

Volatility

MAGX vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) at 4.94%. This indicates that MAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGXYMAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.04%

4.94%

+7.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.25%

12.09%

+18.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.44%

16.32%

+24.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.63%

20.95%

+32.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.63%

20.95%

+32.68%

MAGX vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGX vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison

MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than YMAG's 52.38% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, MAGX and YMAG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MAGX has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to YMAG (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGX dropped -54.19% vs YMAG's -25.96%.

On 1-year performance, MAGX leads with 38.21% vs 21.96% for YMAG. On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAGX has performed better with a 38.21% return vs 21.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 52.38%, compared with 2.19% for MAGX.

MAGX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while YMAG is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MAGX and 1.28% for YMAG.

YMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGX and YMAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer