MAGX vs. QQQU
MAGX (Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF) and QQQU (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MAGX is actively managed, while QQQU is passively managed. Over the past year, MAGX returned 38.21% vs 45.58% for QQQU. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MAGX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for QQQU.
Performance
MAGX vs. QQQU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGX achieves a -6.68% return, which is significantly lower than QQQU's -4.37% return.
MAGX
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- -11.98%
- YTD
- -6.68%
- 6M
- -7.79%
- 1Y
- 38.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQU
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -11.49%
- YTD
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -5.10%
- 1Y
- 45.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGX vs. QQQU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | -6.68% | 26.16% | 85.10% |
QQQU Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares | -4.37% | 32.87% | 87.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGX and QQQU is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.98 |
The correlation between MAGX and QQQU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
MAGX vs. QQQU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAGX
QQQU
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
MAGX
QQQU
-
Basic Materials
MAGX
-
QQQU
-
Communication Services
MAGX
-
QQQU
Consumer Cyclical
MAGX
-
QQQU
Consumer Defensive
MAGX
-
QQQU
-
Energy
MAGX
-
QQQU
-
Healthcare
MAGX
-
QQQU
-
Industrials
MAGX
-
QQQU
-
Real Estate
MAGX
-
QQQU
-
Technology
MAGX
-
QQQU
Utilities
MAGX
-
QQQU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGX vs. QQQU — Risk / Return Rank
MAGX
QQQU
MAGX vs. QQQU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGX | QQQU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.21 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 1.26 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.15 | 3.91 | -0.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGX | QQQU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.14 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.89 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
MAGX vs. QQQU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQU drawdown of -53.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and QQQU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGX | QQQU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.19% | -53.70% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.24% | -36.29% | -0.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.94% | -14.58% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.74% | -13.30% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.18% | 11.70% | +0.48% |
Volatility
MAGX vs. QQQU - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares (QQQU) at 11.45%. This indicates that MAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGX | QQQU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.04% | 11.45% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.25% | 29.39% | +0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.44% | 40.13% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.63% | 53.09% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.63% | 53.09% | +0.54% |
MAGX vs. QQQU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQU's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGX vs. QQQU - Dividend Comparison
MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than QQQU's 10.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGX Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF | 2.19% | 2.05% | 0.86% |
QQQU Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bull 2X Shares | 10.03% | 9.62% | 2.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, MAGX and QQQU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MAGX has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to QQQU (11.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGX dropped -54.19% vs QQQU's -53.70%.
On 1-year performance, QQQU leads with 45.58% vs 38.21% for MAGX. On fees, MAGX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QQQU has been the lower-risk option at 11.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQU has performed better with a 45.58% return vs 38.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for QQQU.
QQQU has the higher dividend yield at 10.03%, compared with 2.19% for MAGX.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MAGX and 1.07% for QQQU.
QQQU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGX and QQQU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer