PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MAGX vs. FNGO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


MAGXFNGO
Daily Std Dev51.04%48.99%
Max Drawdown-34.50%-78.39%
Current Drawdown-21.23%-20.52%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between MAGX and FNGO is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

MAGX vs. FNGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
21.59%
14.71%
MAGX
FNGO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MAGX vs. FNGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MAGX and FNGO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
Expense ratio chart for MAGX: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for FNGO: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MAGX vs. FNGO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGX
Sharpe ratio
No data
FNGO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FNGO, currently valued at 1.72, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.72
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FNGO, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FNGO, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FNGO, currently valued at 1.85, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.85
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FNGO, currently valued at 7.95, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.95

MAGX vs. FNGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

MAGX vs. FNGO - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAGX nor FNGO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MAGX vs. FNGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -34.50%, smaller than the maximum FNGO drawdown of -78.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and FNGO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-21.23%
-20.52%
MAGX
FNGO

Volatility

MAGX vs. FNGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) is 15.20%, while MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) has a volatility of 16.99%. This indicates that MAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
15.20%
16.99%
MAGX
FNGO