PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGX vs. FNGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MAGX vs. FNGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MAGX vs. FNGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAGX
Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF
-23.25%26.16%81.14%
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
-22.92%25.49%60.05%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MAGX having a -23.25% return and FNGO slightly higher at -22.92%.


MAGX

1D
2.69%
1M
-10.34%
YTD
-23.25%
6M
-21.67%
1Y
37.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FNGO

1D
2.95%
1M
-8.44%
YTD
-22.92%
6M
-28.65%
1Y
28.52%
3Y*
52.54%
5Y*
18.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MAGX vs. FNGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MAGX and FNGO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Return for Risk

MAGX vs. FNGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGX
MAGX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGO
FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGX vs. FNGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGXFNGODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

0.53

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.33

1.16

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.15

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

0.74

+0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.66

2.08

+1.58

MAGX vs. FNGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the FNGO Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGX and FNGO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGXFNGODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.53

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.53

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between MAGX and FNGO is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MAGX vs. FNGO - Dividend Comparison

MAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

MAGX vs. FNGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, smaller than the maximum FNGO drawdown of -78.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGX and FNGO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGXFNGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.19%

-78.39%

+24.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.24%

-42.73%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.46%

-35.78%

+6.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.08%

-24.17%

+10.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.80%

15.17%

-3.37%

Volatility

MAGX vs. FNGO - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Daily 2X Long Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGX) and MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) have volatilities of 16.99% and 16.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MAGXFNGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.99%

16.20%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.00%

30.54%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.15%

54.60%

+2.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.60%

60.29%

-5.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.60%

61.90%

-7.30%