MAGC vs. KURE
MAGC (Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF) and KURE (KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF) are both China Equities funds. MAGC is actively managed, while KURE is passively managed. Over the past year, MAGC returned -15.61% vs -0.64% for KURE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAGC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for KURE.
Performance
MAGC vs. KURE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGC achieves a -15.36% return, which is significantly lower than KURE's -8.04% return.
MAGC
- 1D
- 4.10%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -15.36%
- 6M
- -17.67%
- 1Y
- -15.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KURE
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -10.61%
- YTD
- -8.04%
- 6M
- -13.23%
- 1Y
- -0.64%
- 3Y*
- -5.12%
- 5Y*
- -15.62%
- 10Y*
- —
MAGC vs. KURE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF | -15.36% | 16.35% | -14.54% |
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | -8.04% | 24.87% | -18.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGC and KURE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024 | 0.56 |
The correlation between MAGC and KURE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGC vs. KURE — Risk / Return Rank
MAGC
KURE
MAGC vs. KURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) and KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGC | KURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | -0.02 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | 0.15 | -0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.02 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | -0.01 | -0.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | -0.02 | -0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGC | KURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 | -0.02 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.29 | -0.09 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
MAGC vs. KURE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGC drawdown since its inception was -32.86%, smaller than the maximum KURE drawdown of -68.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGC and KURE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGC | KURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.86% | -68.53% | +35.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.86% | -25.43% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -67.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.88% | -59.96% | +31.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -38.06% | +22.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.98% | 13.01% | +3.97% |
Volatility
MAGC vs. KURE - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) has a higher volatility of 10.63% compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) at 6.84%. This indicates that MAGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGC | KURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.63% | 6.84% | +3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.54% | 17.45% | +2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.65% | 26.34% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.36% | 31.84% | +2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.36% | 32.38% | +1.98% |
MAGC vs. KURE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KURE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGC vs. KURE - Dividend Comparison
MAGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than KURE's 4.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 4.56% | 4.19% | 1.29% | 0.65% | 0.05% | 14.12% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.21% |
MAGC Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF | 4.85% | 4.10% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGC and KURE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGC has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to KURE (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGC dropped -32.86% vs KURE's -68.53%.
On 1-year performance, KURE leads with -0.64% vs -15.61% for MAGC. On fees, MAGC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, KURE has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KURE has performed better with a -0.64% return vs -15.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KURE.
MAGC has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 4.56% for KURE.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for MAGC and 0.65% for KURE.
KURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGC and KURE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer