PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KURE vs. PILL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KURE vs. PILL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares (PILL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KURE achieves a -10.68% return, which is significantly lower than PILL's -9.17% return.


KURE

1D
-2.87%
1M
-12.23%
YTD
-10.68%
6M
-15.54%
1Y
-5.05%
3Y*
-6.04%
5Y*
-16.33%
10Y*

PILL

1D
2.86%
1M
-15.52%
YTD
-9.17%
6M
0.63%
1Y
106.72%
3Y*
13.99%
5Y*
-11.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KURE vs. PILL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
-10.68%24.87%-17.83%-17.70%-25.43%-16.01%68.97%34.30%-30.07%
PILL
Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares
-9.17%75.14%-7.26%-12.06%-43.16%-37.33%0.28%19.26%-33.54%

Correlation

The correlation between KURE and PILL is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2018

0.29

KURE vs. PILL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KURE
PILL

Healthcare

99.3%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

KURE
99.3%
PILL
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

KURE
0.7%
PILL

-

Basic Materials

KURE

-

PILL

-

Communication Services

KURE

-

PILL

-

Consumer Cyclical

KURE

-

PILL

-

Energy

KURE

-

PILL

-

Financial Services

KURE

-

PILL

-

Industrials

KURE

-

PILL

-

Real Estate

KURE

-

PILL

-

Technology

KURE

-

PILL

-

Utilities

KURE

-

PILL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KURE vs. PILL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KURE
KURE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
KURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
KURE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
KURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
KURE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

PILL
PILL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PILL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PILL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KURE vs. PILL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares (PILL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KUREPILLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.19

1.74

-1.93

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.09

2.31

-2.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.28

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

3.23

-3.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.39

10.63

-11.02

KURE vs. PILL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KURE Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the PILL Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KURE and PILL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KUREPILLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

1.74

-1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.52

-0.20

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

-0.12

+0.02

Drawdowns

KURE vs. PILL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KURE drawdown since its inception was -68.53%, smaller than the maximum PILL drawdown of -88.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KURE and PILL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KUREPILLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.53%

-88.76%

+20.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.53%

-33.21%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.05%

-60.43%

+26.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.94%

-83.38%

+15.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.11%

-68.88%

+7.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.07%

-58.54%

+20.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.13%

10.07%

+3.06%

Volatility

KURE vs. PILL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) is 7.23%, while Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares (PILL) has a volatility of 20.62%. This indicates that KURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PILL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KUREPILLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.23%

20.62%

-13.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.67%

48.56%

-30.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.49%

61.71%

-35.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.86%

60.42%

-28.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.39%

63.79%

-31.40%

KURE vs. PILL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KURE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PILL's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

KURE vs. PILL - Dividend Comparison

KURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than PILL's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
4.70%4.19%1.29%0.65%0.05%14.12%0.00%0.25%0.21%0.00%
PILL
Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares
0.69%0.69%1.28%1.83%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.38%0.91%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


KURE and PILL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PILL has higher volatility (20.62%) compared to KURE (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KURE dropped -68.53% vs PILL's -88.76%.

On 5-year performance, PILL leads with -11.92% vs -16.33% for KURE. On fees, KURE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, KURE has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PILL has performed better with a -11.92% return vs -16.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KURE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for PILL.

KURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.69% for PILL.

KURE is categorized as China Equities, while PILL is Leveraged Equities. KURE tracks MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index, while PILL tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KURE and 0.98% for PILL.

PILL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KURE and PILL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer