KURE vs. CQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ).
KURE and CQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KURE is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index. It was launched on Feb 1, 2018. CQQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the AlphaShares China Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2009. Both KURE and CQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KURE or CQQQ.
Correlation
The correlation between KURE and CQQQ is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
KURE vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
KURE:
-0.47
CQQQ:
0.30
KURE:
-0.50
CQQQ:
0.77
KURE:
0.94
CQQQ:
1.09
KURE:
-0.24
CQQQ:
0.16
KURE:
-0.86
CQQQ:
0.95
KURE:
18.99%
CQQQ:
12.79%
KURE:
34.65%
CQQQ:
40.07%
KURE:
-68.53%
CQQQ:
-73.99%
KURE:
-65.29%
CQQQ:
-62.89%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KURE achieves a -18.20% return, which is significantly lower than CQQQ's 10.90% return.
KURE
-18.20%
-2.94%
2.23%
-16.73%
-6.32%
N/A
CQQQ
10.90%
-1.56%
11.90%
10.75%
-5.29%
1.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KURE vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
KURE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KURE vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KURE vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither KURE nor CQQQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.05% | 14.12% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.55% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.01% | 0.43% | 1.42% | 1.69% | 1.77% | 1.00% | 0.79% |
Drawdowns
KURE vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KURE drawdown since its inception was -68.53%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KURE and CQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KURE vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) is 11.51%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 12.75%. This indicates that KURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.