KURE vs. CNYA
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA).
KURE and CNYA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KURE is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index. It was launched on Feb 1, 2018. CNYA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. It was launched on Jun 13, 2016. Both KURE and CNYA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: KURE or CNYA.
Key characteristics
| KURE | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -12.35% | 4.88% |
| 1Y Return | -25.06% | -11.42% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -25.91% | -11.84% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -3.38% | 1.58% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.87 | -0.51 |
| Daily Std Dev | 26.16% | 18.07% |
| Max Drawdown | -66.79% | -49.49% |
| Current Drawdown | -62.80% | -40.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between KURE and CNYA is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
KURE vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, KURE achieves a -12.35% return, which is significantly lower than CNYA's 4.88% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KURE vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
KURE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
KURE vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
KURE vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
KURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than CNYA's 4.03% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.65% | 0.05% | 14.12% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 4.03% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% |
Drawdowns
KURE vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KURE drawdown since its inception was -66.79%, which is greater than CNYA's maximum drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KURE and CNYA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
KURE vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) at 4.94%. This indicates that KURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.