ASHS vs. FLCH
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH).
ASHS and FLCH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHS is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the CSI 500 Index. It was launched on May 21, 2014. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both ASHS and FLCH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASHS or FLCH.
Correlation
The correlation between ASHS and FLCH is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ASHS vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ASHS:
0.12
FLCH:
0.59
ASHS:
0.49
FLCH:
1.08
ASHS:
1.07
FLCH:
1.14
ASHS:
0.07
FLCH:
0.31
ASHS:
0.34
FLCH:
1.59
ASHS:
14.64%
FLCH:
11.65%
ASHS:
40.33%
FLCH:
31.53%
ASHS:
-69.90%
FLCH:
-62.09%
ASHS:
-59.68%
FLCH:
-48.82%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHS achieves a -2.56% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -3.75% return.
ASHS
-2.56%
-7.54%
10.85%
5.22%
-0.87%
-1.41%
FLCH
-3.75%
-5.17%
6.80%
18.81%
-5.27%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASHS vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASHS vs. FLCH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ASHS
FLCH
ASHS vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASHS vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
ASHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than FLCH's 2.99% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.91% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% | 0.59% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.99% | 2.88% | 3.46% | 2.69% | 1.49% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ASHS vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHS drawdown since its inception was -69.90%, which is greater than FLCH's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHS and FLCH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASHS vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 5.15%. This indicates that ASHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.