ASHS vs. KBA
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA).
ASHS and KBA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHS is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the CSI 500 Index. It was launched on May 21, 2014. KBA is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2014. Both ASHS and KBA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASHS or KBA.
Correlation
The correlation between ASHS and KBA is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ASHS vs. KBA - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
ASHS:
0.11
KBA:
0.21
ASHS:
0.48
KBA:
0.65
ASHS:
1.07
KBA:
1.09
ASHS:
0.08
KBA:
0.19
ASHS:
0.26
KBA:
0.51
ASHS:
20.35%
KBA:
17.60%
ASHS:
39.18%
KBA:
30.48%
ASHS:
-69.90%
KBA:
-53.24%
ASHS:
-57.82%
KBA:
-36.07%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHS achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly lower than KBA's 2.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHS has underperformed KBA with an annualized return of -6.85%, while KBA has yielded a comparatively higher -3.15% annualized return.
ASHS
1.92%
4.48%
-2.19%
4.39%
-2.89%
1.02%
-6.85%
KBA
2.35%
5.26%
0.12%
6.24%
-3.10%
1.65%
-3.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASHS vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASHS vs. KBA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ASHS
KBA
ASHS vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
ASHS vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison
ASHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than KBA's 2.13% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.68% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.91% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% | 0.59% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 2.13% | 2.18% | 2.34% | 26.65% | 9.06% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 1.00% | 4.90% | 29.08% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
ASHS vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHS drawdown since its inception was -69.90%, which is greater than KBA's maximum drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHS and KBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
ASHS vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) at 4.12%. This indicates that ASHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...