ASHS vs. FXI
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI).
ASHS and FXI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHS is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the CSI 500 Index. It was launched on May 21, 2014. FXI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 25 Index. It was launched on Oct 5, 2004. Both ASHS and FXI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASHS or FXI.
Key characteristics
| ASHS | FXI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.36% | 12.98% |
| 1Y Return | -13.33% | 1.61% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -7.72% | -14.16% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.05% | -7.35% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.59 | 0.04 |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.82% | 28.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.90% | -72.68% |
| Current Drawdown | -59.16% | -46.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHS and FXI is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ASHS vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ASHS achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than FXI's 12.98% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASHS vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASHS vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASHS vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
ASHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than FXI's 2.80% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.64% | 0.65% | 1.90% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% | 0.59% | 0.00% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.80% | 3.17% | 2.60% | 1.59% | 2.18% | 2.72% | 2.68% | 2.30% | 2.68% | 2.89% | 2.50% | 2.63% |
Drawdowns
ASHS vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHS drawdown since its inception was -69.90%, roughly equal to the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHS and FXI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASHS vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) is 7.60%, while iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that ASHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.