ASHS vs. FXI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) and FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) are both China Equities funds - ASHS tracks the CSI 500 Index while FXI tracks the FTSE China 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ASHS returned 2.41%/yr vs 2.81%/yr for FXI. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ASHS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FXI.

Performance

ASHS vs. FXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASHS achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly higher than FXI's -3.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHS has underperformed FXI with an annualized return of 2.41%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively higher 2.81% annualized return.

ASHS

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: -11.80%
• 6M: -5.14%
• YTD: 5.42%
• 1Y: 31.86%
• 3Y*: 10.54%
• 5Y*: 2.02%
• 10Y*: 2.41%
• ALL TIME*: 5.12%

FXI

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 14.38%
• 6M: -7.16%
• YTD: -3.96%
• 1Y: 0.93%
• 3Y*: 9.88%
• 5Y*: 0.26%
• 10Y*: 2.81%
• ALL TIME*: 5.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	$378.39K	$628.93K	$596.17K
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF	$773.89M	$798.32M	$975.73M

ASHS vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	5.42%	39.48%	2.68%	-10.03%	-24.78%	17.66%	28.22%	24.53%	-35.91%	7.90%
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF	-3.96%	28.95%	28.98%	-12.42%	-20.66%	-20.06%	8.92%	14.90%	-13.28%	36.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ASHS and FXI is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2014	0.58

The correlation between ASHS and FXI shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.59 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ASHS vs. FXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ASHS	FXI
Technology	31.6%	5.9%
Industrials	16.8%	2.8%
Basic Materials	16.8%	3.4%
Healthcare	7.8%	2.6%
Financial Services	6.4%	35.2%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	25.3%
Utilities	2.5%	0.3%
Energy	2.4%	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.9%	0.8%
Communication Services	1.1%	17.8%
Real Estate	0.6%	1.0%

Return for Risk

ASHS vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ASHS

ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 48
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 48

FXI

FXI Risk / Return Rank: 10
FXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FXI Omega Ratio Rank: 10
FXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FXI Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ASHS vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASHS	FXI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	-0.04	+1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	0.09	+1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.01	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	-0.03	+1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.53	-0.07	+5.60

ASHS vs. FXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASHS Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the FXI Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASHS and FXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASHS vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASHS drawdown since its inception was -69.90%, roughly equal to the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHS and FXI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASHS	FXI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.90%	-72.68%	+2.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.46%	-22.94%	+5.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.13%	-25.56%	-8.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.81%	-49.88%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.81%	-60.81%	+13.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.15%	-24.37%	-14.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.36%	-31.21%	-17.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.76%	10.00%	-4.24%

Volatility

ASHS vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) has a higher volatility of 12.45% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 5.14%. This indicates that ASHS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASHS	FXI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.45%	5.14%	+7.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.30%	14.61%	+6.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.59%	20.32%	+6.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.11%	31.44%	-4.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.86%	27.60%	-1.74%

ASHS vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASHS vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison

ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	0.65%	1.90%	0.76%	0.43%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.34%
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF	1.86%	2.42%	1.76%	3.17%	2.61%	1.60%	2.19%	2.74%	2.69%	2.31%	2.69%	2.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASHS and FXI in my portfolio?

ASHS and FXI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASHS or FXI?

ASHS has higher volatility (12.45%) compared to FXI (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASHS dropped -69.90% vs FXI's -72.68%.

Which ETF is better, ASHS or FXI?

On 10-year performance, FXI leads with 2.81% vs 2.41% for ASHS. On fees, ASHS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ASHS or FXI?

Over the 10-year period, FXI has performed better with a 2.81% return vs 2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASHS or FXI?

ASHS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASHS or FXI?

FXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.00% for ASHS.

What is the main difference between ASHS and FXI?

ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index, while FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHS and 0.74% for FXI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.