ASHS vs. ECNS
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS).
ASHS and ECNS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHS is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the CSI 500 Index. It was launched on May 21, 2014. ECNS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Small Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2010. Both ASHS and ECNS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASHS or ECNS.
Correlation
The correlation between ASHS and ECNS is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ASHS vs. ECNS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ASHS:
0.15
ECNS:
0.42
ASHS:
0.43
ECNS:
0.79
ASHS:
1.06
ECNS:
1.11
ASHS:
0.06
ECNS:
0.22
ASHS:
0.20
ECNS:
0.86
ASHS:
20.15%
ECNS:
15.95%
ASHS:
39.11%
ECNS:
36.70%
ASHS:
-69.90%
ECNS:
-63.43%
ASHS:
-57.66%
ECNS:
-48.84%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHS achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than ECNS's 8.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHS has underperformed ECNS with an annualized return of -5.31%, while ECNS has yielded a comparatively higher -3.72% annualized return.
ASHS
2.32%
13.17%
-10.42%
5.83%
1.02%
-5.31%
ECNS
8.50%
17.17%
2.67%
15.17%
-1.31%
-3.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASHS vs. ECNS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ECNS's 0.59% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASHS vs. ECNS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ASHS
ECNS
ASHS vs. ECNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASHS vs. ECNS - Dividend Comparison
ASHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than ECNS's 5.51% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.67% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.90% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% | 0.59% |
ECNS iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | 5.51% | 5.98% | 4.90% | 3.54% | 4.87% | 3.59% | 3.23% | 6.16% | 3.18% | 4.30% | 3.58% | 2.51% |
Drawdowns
ASHS vs. ECNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHS drawdown since its inception was -69.90%, which is greater than ECNS's maximum drawdown of -63.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHS and ECNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASHS vs. ECNS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) is 7.30%, while iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) has a volatility of 9.88%. This indicates that ASHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.