PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYG vs. WPP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LYG vs. WPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) and WPP plc (WPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYG achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly higher than WPP's -20.08% return. Over the past 10 years, LYG has outperformed WPP with an annualized return of 8.00%, while WPP has yielded a comparatively lower -12.62% annualized return.


LYG

1D
-0.19%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
2.45%
6M
6.89%
1Y
31.26%
3Y*
39.69%
5Y*
20.09%
10Y*
8.00%

WPP

1D
-1.36%
1M
-5.37%
YTD
-20.08%
6M
-9.61%
1Y
-51.45%
3Y*
-27.77%
5Y*
-20.45%
10Y*
-12.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYG vs. WPP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc
2.45%103.71%20.30%14.68%-9.47%33.81%-40.79%36.81%-28.35%30.79%
WPP
WPP plc
-20.08%-53.53%13.55%1.49%-31.96%43.52%-17.24%36.53%-36.30%-14.98%

Correlation

The correlation between LYG and WPP is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 28, 2001

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between LYG and WPP has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

LYG:

$0.45

WPP:

$1.51

PE Ratio

LYG:

11.86

WPP:

11.58

PEG Ratio

LYG:

5.93

WPP:

0.15

PS Ratio

LYG:

0.92

WPP:

0.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

LYG:

$65.49B

WPP:

$28.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LYG:

$65.49B

WPP:

$4.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

LYG:

$7.17B

WPP:

$2.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYG vs. WPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYG
LYG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
LYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

WPP
WPP Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
WPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPP Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
WPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPP Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYG vs. WPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) and WPP plc (WPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYGWPPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.79

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

-0.87

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.85

-1.22

+5.06

LYG vs. WPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the WPP Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYG and WPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYGWPPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

-1.07

+2.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

-0.59

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

-0.36

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.01

-0.04

Drawdowns

LYG vs. WPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYG drawdown since its inception was -94.84%, roughly equal to the maximum WPP drawdown of -95.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYG and WPP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYGWPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.84%

-95.30%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.72%

-59.39%

+36.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-71.59%

+48.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.19%

-77.69%

+37.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.72%

-79.99%

+11.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.66%

-76.22%

+18.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.42%

-42.50%

-20.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.15%

42.31%

-34.16%

Volatility

LYG vs. WPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is 8.88%, while WPP plc (WPP) has a volatility of 13.71%. This indicates that LYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYGWPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

13.71%

-4.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.77%

32.91%

-11.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.07%

48.22%

-20.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.06%

34.80%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.52%

35.12%

+1.40%

Dividends

LYG vs. WPP - Dividend Comparison

LYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than WPP's 5.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc
3.76%3.19%5.44%5.23%4.92%2.70%0.00%5.04%6.63%6.81%5.17%2.11%
WPP
WPP plc
5.79%9.09%4.85%5.09%4.38%2.45%5.66%5.47%7.35%4.32%3.01%2.81%

Financials

LYG vs. WPP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lloyds Banking Group plc and WPP plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00B0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
5.18B
6.89B
(LYG) Total Revenue
(WPP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LYG vs. WPP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lloyds Banking Group plc and WPP plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
19.0%
Portfolio components
LYG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 5.18B and revenue of 5.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

WPP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported a gross profit of 1.31B and revenue of 6.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.

LYG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 2.03B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.1%.

WPP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported an operating income of 161.00M and revenue of 6.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

LYG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.53B and revenue of 5.18B, resulting in a net margin of 29.5%.

WPP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WPP plc reported a net income of -259.00M and revenue of 6.89B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LYG and WPP have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WPP has higher volatility (13.71%) compared to LYG (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYG dropped -94.84% vs WPP's -95.30%.

LYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYG and WPP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer