LYG vs. CNX
LYG (Lloyds Banking Group plc) and CNX (CNX Resources Corporation) are both stocks. LYG operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while CNX operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, LYG returned 12.99%/yr vs 6.88%/yr for CNX. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LYG vs. CNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYG achieves a 19.27% return, which is significantly higher than CNX's -2.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LYG has outperformed CNX with an annualized return of 12.99%, while CNX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.88% annualized return.
LYG
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 19.27%
- 1Y
- 47.19%
- 3Y*
- 47.39%
- 5Y*
- 25.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.65%
CNX
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- 6M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- -2.64%
- 1Y
- 23.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.44%
- 5Y*
- 24.23%
- 10Y*
- 6.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $59.57M | $59.07M | $63.51M | |
| $101.57M | $99.91M | $119.79M |
LYG vs. CNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 19.27% | 103.71% | 20.30% | 14.68% | -9.47% | 33.81% | -40.79% | 36.81% | -28.35% | 30.79% |
CNX CNX Resources Corporation | -2.64% | 0.27% | 83.35% | 18.76% | 22.47% | 27.31% | 22.03% | -22.50% | -21.94% | -19.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYG and CNX is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2001 | 0.27 |
The correlation between LYG and CNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LYG:
$89.56B
CNX:
$5.06B
LYG:
£0.34
CNX:
$5.98
LYG:
13.54
CNX:
5.98
LYG:
6.77
CNX:
0.00
LYG:
1.05
CNX:
2.38
LYG:
1.46
CNX:
1.14
LYG:
£65.45B
CNX:
$2.39B
LYG:
£65.45B
CNX:
$921.84M
LYG:
£7.45B
CNX:
$1.89B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYG vs. CNX — Risk / Return Rank
LYG
CNX
LYG vs. CNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) and CNX Resources Corporation (CNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYG | CNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.12 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 0.73 | +1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.18 | 1.63 | +4.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYG vs. CNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYG drawdown since its inception was -94.84%, roughly equal to the maximum CNX drawdown of -95.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYG and CNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYG | CNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.84% | -95.41% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.72% | -24.92% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -33.37% | +10.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.19% | -38.23% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.72% | -77.19% | +8.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.71% | -67.01% | +16.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -58.47% | -4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.45% | 11.25% | -2.80% |
Volatility
LYG vs. CNX - Volatility Comparison
Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) has a higher volatility of 10.40% compared to CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) at 7.65%. This indicates that LYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYG | CNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.40% | 7.65% | +2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.44% | 20.83% | +3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.33% | 28.70% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.12% | 35.05% | -2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.82% | 47.99% | -13.17% |
Dividends
LYG vs. CNX - Dividend Comparison
LYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, while CNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNX CNX Resources Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 1.84% |
LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 3.23% | 3.19% | 5.44% | 5.23% | 4.92% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 5.04% | 6.63% | 6.81% | 5.17% | 2.11% |
Financials
LYG vs. CNX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lloyds Banking Group plc and CNX Resources Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LYG vs. CNX - Profitability Comparison
LYG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 13.84B and revenue of 13.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
CNX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CNX Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 618.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LYG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 2.27B and revenue of 13.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.
CNX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CNX Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 2.03M and revenue of 618.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
LYG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.53B and revenue of 13.84B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
CNX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CNX Resources Corporation reported a net income of 202.94M and revenue of 618.48M, resulting in a net margin of 32.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYG and CNX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LYG has higher volatility (10.40%) compared to CNX (7.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYG dropped -94.84% vs CNX's -95.41%.
LYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LYG and CNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer