LYG vs. BCS
Compare and contrast key facts about Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) and Barclays PLC (BCS).
Performance
LYG vs. BCS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LYG vs. BCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | -1.51% | 103.71% | 20.30% | 14.68% | -9.47% | 33.81% | -40.79% | 36.81% | -28.35% | 30.79% |
BCS Barclays PLC | -13.20% | 96.49% | 76.26% | 6.01% | -21.90% | 31.71% | -12.84% | 31.90% | -29.25% | 0.44% |
Fundamentals
LYG:
$78.03B
BCS:
$75.77B
LYG:
$0.31
BCS:
$2.04
LYG:
16.90
BCS:
10.69
LYG:
8.45
BCS:
1.93
LYG:
1.21
BCS:
2.73
LYG:
1.86
BCS:
0.97
LYG:
$65.00B
BCS:
$28.09B
LYG:
$65.00B
BCS:
$28.09B
LYG:
$6.66B
BCS:
$7.30B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYG achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly higher than BCS's -13.20% return. Over the past 10 years, LYG has underperformed BCS with an annualized return of 7.63%, while BCS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.13% annualized return.
LYG
- 1D
- 3.78%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- -1.51%
- 6M
- 15.49%
- 1Y
- 43.24%
- 3Y*
- 37.94%
- 5Y*
- 22.84%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
BCS
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- -13.20%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 44.62%
- 3Y*
- 49.73%
- 5Y*
- 20.64%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYG vs. BCS — Risk / Return Rank
LYG
BCS
LYG vs. BCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) and Barclays PLC (BCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYG | BCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.49 | 1.42 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 1.91 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 1.72 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.59 | 5.98 | +0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYG | BCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.42 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.61 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.35 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.03 | 0.17 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between LYG and BCS is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LYG vs. BCS - Dividend Comparison
LYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than BCS's 2.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYG Lloyds Banking Group plc | 3.24% | 3.19% | 5.44% | 5.23% | 4.92% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 5.04% | 6.63% | 6.81% | 5.17% | 2.11% |
BCS Barclays PLC | 2.14% | 1.70% | 3.13% | 4.86% | 4.18% | 1.61% | 3.91% | 3.68% | 3.21% | 1.37% | 2.26% | 2.95% |
Drawdowns
LYG vs. BCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYG drawdown since its inception was -94.84%, roughly equal to the maximum BCS drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYG and BCS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYG | BCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.84% | -94.36% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.72% | -26.20% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.19% | -48.14% | +7.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.72% | -66.10% | -2.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.30% | -35.45% | -23.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.47% | -38.46% | -25.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 7.53% | -1.03% |
Volatility
LYG vs. BCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is 10.94%, while Barclays PLC (BCS) has a volatility of 12.26%. This indicates that LYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LYG | BCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.94% | 12.26% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.13% | 21.61% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.18% | 31.53% | -2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.87% | 33.92% | -2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.47% | 37.73% | -1.26% |
Financials
LYG vs. BCS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lloyds Banking Group plc and Barclays PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LYG vs. BCS - Profitability Comparison
LYG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 50.75B and revenue of 50.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
BCS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Barclays PLC reported a gross profit of 6.50B and revenue of 6.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
LYG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 1.98B and revenue of 50.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.
BCS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Barclays PLC reported an operating income of 1.91B and revenue of 6.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.4%.
LYG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.27B and revenue of 50.75B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.
BCS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Barclays PLC reported a net income of 1.45B and revenue of 6.50B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.