NAT vs. DAC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) and Danaos Corporation (DAC).

Performance

NAT vs. DAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) and Danaos Corporation (DAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NAT vs. DAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NAT Nordic American Tankers Limited	75.65%	54.57%	-33.63%	55.83%	87.90%	-41.48%	-32.82%	156.48%	-13.56%	-68.39%
DAC Danaos Corporation	20.59%	22.24%	12.41%	47.51%	-26.57%	256.10%	133.44%	-12.57%	-48.28%	-45.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NAT : $1.24B DAC : $2.07B
EPS NAT : $0.06 DAC : $26.91
PE Ratio NAT : 101.10 DAC : 4.19
PS Ratio NAT : 4.24 DAC : 1.99
PB Ratio NAT : 2.79 DAC : 0.55
Total Revenue (TTM) NAT : $292.42M DAC : $1.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) NAT : $57.87M DAC : $626.24M
EBITDA (TTM) NAT : $105.20M DAC : $736.66M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAT achieves a 75.65% return, which is significantly higher than DAC's 20.59% return. Over the past 10 years, NAT has underperformed DAC with an annualized return of -0.62%, while DAC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.04% annualized return.

NAT

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: 5.45%
• YTD: 75.65%
• 6M: 99.36%
• 1Y: 169.36%
• 3Y*: 27.91%
• 5Y*: 21.50%
• 10Y*: -0.62%

DAC

• 1D: 2.60%
• 1M: -4.50%
• YTD: 20.59%
• 6M: 27.64%
• 1Y: 49.75%
• 3Y*: 32.51%
• 5Y*: 21.86%
• 10Y*: 10.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NAT vs. DAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAT

NAT Risk / Return Rank: 99
NAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
NAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
NAT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
NAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
NAT Martin Ratio Rank: 99

DAC

DAC Risk / Return Rank: 88
DAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
DAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
DAC Omega Ratio Rank: 86
DAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
DAC Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAT vs. DAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) and Danaos Corporation (DAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NAT	DAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.69	1.86	+2.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.12	2.57	+2.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.34	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.63	2.88	+8.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	38.34	10.63	+27.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NAT vs. DAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAT Sharpe Ratio is 4.69, which is higher than the DAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAT and DAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NAT	DAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.69	1.86	+2.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.60	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.01	0.15	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	-0.05	+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between NAT and DAC is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NAT vs. DAC - Dividend Comparison

NAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than DAC's 3.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NAT Nordic American Tankers Limited	8.02%	10.47%	16.00%	11.67%	3.59%	3.55%	15.25%	2.03%	8.00%	21.54%	16.31%	8.88%
DAC Danaos Corporation	3.11%	3.66%	4.06%	4.12%	5.70%	2.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NAT vs. DAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAT drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, smaller than the maximum DAC drawdown of -99.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAT and DAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAT	DAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.20%	-99.42%	+9.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.01%	-16.45%	+2.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.91%	-50.14%	-11.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.33%	-95.81%	+8.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.02%	-71.34%	+33.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.02%	-80.58%	+36.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	4.45%	-0.20%

Volatility

NAT vs. DAC - Volatility Comparison

Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) has a higher volatility of 14.52% compared to Danaos Corporation (DAC) at 9.33%. This indicates that NAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAT	DAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.52%	9.33%	+5.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.51%	15.40%	+10.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.42%	26.95%	+9.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.21%	36.45%	+14.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.92%	65.54%	-7.62%

Financials

NAT vs. DAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nordic American Tankers Limited and Danaos Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nordic American Tankers Limited reported a gross profit of 29.04M and revenue of 85.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.8%.

DAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a gross profit of 172.70M and revenue of 266.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.9%.

NAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nordic American Tankers Limited reported an operating income of 20.43M and revenue of 85.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

DAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Danaos Corporation reported an operating income of 122.93M and revenue of 266.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

NAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nordic American Tankers Limited reported a net income of 11.66M and revenue of 85.90M, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.

DAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Danaos Corporation reported a net income of 117.91M and revenue of 266.26M, resulting in a net margin of 44.3%.