PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAT vs. INSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NAT vs. INSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NAT having a 94.17% return and INSW slightly higher at 98.69%.


NAT

1D
6.15%
1M
19.96%
YTD
94.17%
6M
95.31%
1Y
159.58%
3Y*
33.66%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
-0.19%

INSW

1D
4.64%
1M
12.03%
YTD
98.69%
6M
97.84%
1Y
148.32%
3Y*
49.17%
5Y*
50.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAT vs. INSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Limited
94.17%54.57%-33.63%55.83%87.90%-41.48%-32.82%156.48%-13.56%-68.39%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
98.69%44.97%-10.85%42.93%162.53%-2.93%-44.43%76.72%-8.78%31.48%

Correlation

The correlation between NAT and INSW is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016

0.61

The correlation between NAT and INSW shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.77 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NAT:

$1.31B

INSW:

$4.40B

EPS

NAT:

$0.26

INSW:

$11.01

PE Ratio

NAT:

24.21

INSW:

8.03

PEG Ratio

NAT:

0.30

INSW:

1.27

PS Ratio

NAT:

3.94

INSW:

6.49

PB Ratio

NAT:

2.88

INSW:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

NAT:

$334.09M

INSW:

$675.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NAT:

$97.31M

INSW:

$274.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

NAT:

$132.71M

INSW:

$525.75M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAT vs. INSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAT
NAT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

INSW
INSW Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
INSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSW Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
INSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSW Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAT vs. INSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NATINSWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.54

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.70

9.23

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.39

26.77

+0.62

NAT vs. INSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAT Sharpe Ratio is 4.33, which is comparable to the INSW Sharpe Ratio of 4.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAT and INSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAT vs. INSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAT drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than INSW's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAT and INSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NATINSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.20%

-57.49%

-32.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.45%

-16.16%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.31%

-50.40%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.72%

-50.40%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.49%

0.00%

-31.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.99%

-20.85%

-23.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.85%

5.63%

+0.22%

Volatility

NAT vs. INSW - Volatility Comparison

Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) has a higher volatility of 13.08% compared to International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) at 11.01%. This indicates that NAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NATINSWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.08%

11.01%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.44%

28.32%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.15%

36.69%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.28%

41.12%

+10.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.12%

45.29%

+12.83%

Dividends

NAT vs. INSW - Dividend Comparison

NAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.98%, more than INSW's 9.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
9.42%6.04%16.05%13.83%3.84%9.26%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Limited
9.98%10.47%16.00%11.67%3.59%3.55%15.25%2.03%8.00%21.54%16.31%8.88%

Financials

NAT vs. INSW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nordic American Tankers Limited and International Seaways, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
106.46M
15.96M
(NAT) Total Revenue
(INSW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NAT and INSW have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NAT has higher volatility (13.08%) compared to INSW (11.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAT dropped -90.20% vs INSW's -57.49%.

NAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.33 vs 4.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAT and INSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer