NAT vs. FZROX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX).

FZROX is managed by Fidelity.

Performance

NAT vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NAT vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NAT Nordic American Tankers Limited	75.65%	54.57%	-33.63%	55.83%	87.90%	-41.48%	-32.82%	156.48%	2.33%
FZROX Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund	-6.77%	17.23%	23.94%	26.20%	-19.21%	26.00%	20.51%	31.15%	-12.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAT achieves a 75.65% return, which is significantly higher than FZROX's -6.77% return.

NAT

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: 5.45%
• YTD: 75.65%
• 6M: 99.36%
• 1Y: 169.36%
• 3Y*: 27.91%
• 5Y*: 21.50%
• 10Y*: -0.62%

FZROX

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -7.71%
• YTD: -6.77%
• 6M: -4.49%
• 1Y: 14.82%
• 3Y*: 16.81%
• 5Y*: 10.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NAT vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAT

NAT Risk / Return Rank: 99
NAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
NAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
NAT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
NAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
NAT Martin Ratio Rank: 99

FZROX

FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAT vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NAT	FZROX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.69	0.84	+3.86
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.12	1.30	+3.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.20	+0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.63	1.05	+10.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	38.34	5.11	+33.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NAT vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAT Sharpe Ratio is 4.69, which is higher than the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAT and FZROX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NAT	FZROX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.69	0.84	+3.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.60	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	0.61	-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between NAT and FZROX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NAT vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

NAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.02%, more than FZROX's 1.10% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NAT Nordic American Tankers Limited	8.02%	10.47%	16.00%	11.67%	3.59%	3.55%	15.25%	2.03%	8.00%	21.54%	16.31%	8.88%
FZROX Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund	1.10%	1.02%	1.16%	1.36%	1.57%	1.25%	1.27%	1.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NAT vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAT drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than FZROX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAT and FZROX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAT	FZROX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.20%	-34.96%	-55.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.01%	-12.44%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.91%	-25.12%	-36.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.02%	-8.89%	-29.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.02%	-5.61%	-38.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	2.56%	+1.69%

Volatility

NAT vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) has a higher volatility of 14.52% compared to Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) at 4.41%. This indicates that NAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAT	FZROX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.52%	4.41%	+10.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.51%	9.34%	+16.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.42%	18.49%	+17.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.21%	17.40%	+33.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.92%	20.25%	+37.67%