LVHD vs. VT
LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LVHD returned 8.26%/yr vs 12.23%/yr for VT. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LVHD charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
LVHD vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 14.88% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 9.97% return. Over the past 10 years, LVHD has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 8.26%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.23% annualized return.
LVHD
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 10.82%
- YTD
- 14.88%
- 1Y
- 14.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.29%
VT
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 6.83%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 18.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- 12.23%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.99M | $3.02M | $2.88M | |
| $317.04M | $378.09M | $471.57M |
LVHD vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 14.88% | 7.50% | 10.18% | -0.95% | -1.82% | 26.90% | -1.28% | 22.91% | -5.58% | 14.25% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 9.97% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHD and VT is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LVHD and VT has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
LVHD vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHD
VT
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
LVHD
VT
Consumer Defensive
LVHD
VT
Real Estate
LVHD
VT
Financial Services
LVHD
VT
Consumer Cyclical
LVHD
VT
Energy
LVHD
VT
Industrials
LVHD
VT
Healthcare
LVHD
VT
Technology
LVHD
VT
Communication Services
LVHD
VT
Basic Materials
LVHD
-
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHD vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
LVHD
VT
LVHD vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVHD | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 1.99 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.80 | 8.34 | -2.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVHD vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHD | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.32% | -50.27% | +12.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.17% | -9.67% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.76% | -16.51% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.75% | -26.38% | +9.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.32% | -34.24% | -3.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.88% | +2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -6.98% | +2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.30% | +0.19% |
Volatility
LVHD vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.47%. This indicates that LVHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHD | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 3.47% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 11.44% | -3.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.44% | 13.76% | -3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.02% | 16.19% | -3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 17.16% | -1.60% |
LVHD vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LVHD vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than VT's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 3.16% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHD and VT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHD has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to VT (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.23% vs 8.26% for LVHD. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.23% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.16%, compared with 1.61% for VT.
LVHD is categorized as Dividend, while VT is Global Equities. LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 0.06% for VT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHD and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer