LVHD vs. VFMV
LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. LVHD is passively managed, while VFMV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHD returned 7.44%/yr vs 9.37%/yr for VFMV. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVHD charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.
Performance
LVHD vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 7.05% return.
LVHD
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 13.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
VFMV
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 6.39%
- 1Y
- 11.08%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHD vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 10.55% | 7.50% | 10.18% | -0.95% | -1.82% | 26.90% | -1.28% | 22.91% | -1.37% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 7.05% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHD and VFMV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between LVHD and VFMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LVHD vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHD
VFMV
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Utilities
LVHD
VFMV
Consumer Defensive
LVHD
VFMV
Real Estate
LVHD
VFMV
Financial Services
LVHD
VFMV
Consumer Cyclical
LVHD
VFMV
Energy
LVHD
VFMV
Industrials
LVHD
VFMV
Healthcare
LVHD
VFMV
Technology
LVHD
VFMV
Communication Services
LVHD
VFMV
Basic Materials
LVHD
-
VFMV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHD vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
LVHD
VFMV
LVHD vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVHD | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 1.85 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.41 | 7.06 | -1.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVHD vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and VFMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHD | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.32% | -33.64% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.17% | -6.00% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.29% | -10.35% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.75% | -15.41% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -2.37% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -3.62% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 1.57% | +0.91% |
Volatility
LVHD vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.50%. This indicates that LVHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHD | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 2.50% | +1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.26% | 6.44% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.98% | 8.89% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.91% | 11.75% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 14.22% | +1.31% |
LVHD vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LVHD vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than VFMV's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 3.29% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.51% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHD and VFMV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHD has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to VFMV (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs VFMV's -33.64%.
On 5-year performance, VFMV leads with 9.37% vs 7.44% for LVHD. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMV has performed better with a 9.37% return vs 7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.51% for VFMV.
LVHD is categorized as Dividend, while VFMV is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 0.13% for VFMV.
LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHD and VFMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer