PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHD vs. VFMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHD vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 7.05% return.


LVHD

1D
1.56%
1M
1.00%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.56%
1Y
13.38%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
8.35%

VFMV

1D
-0.11%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
7.05%
6M
6.39%
1Y
11.08%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
9.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHD vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
10.55%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-1.37%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
7.05%10.52%16.91%8.86%-5.73%20.75%-0.19%27.26%-0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHD and VFMV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018

0.77

The correlation between LVHD and VFMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LVHD vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHD
VFMV

Utilities

24.8%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

21.8%
9.5%

Real Estate

15.4%
6.4%

Financial Services

8.2%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
6.9%

Energy

7.4%
3.9%

Industrials

4.9%
10.1%

Healthcare

4.4%
10.1%

Technology

3.1%
25.1%

Communication Services

2.6%
10.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Utilities

LVHD
24.8%
VFMV
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

LVHD
21.8%
VFMV
9.5%

Real Estate

LVHD
15.4%
VFMV
6.4%

Financial Services

LVHD
8.2%
VFMV
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHD
7.4%
VFMV
6.9%

Energy

LVHD
7.4%
VFMV
3.9%

Industrials

LVHD
4.9%
VFMV
10.1%

Healthcare

LVHD
4.4%
VFMV
10.1%

Technology

LVHD
3.1%
VFMV
25.1%

Communication Services

LVHD
2.6%
VFMV
10.7%

Basic Materials

LVHD

-

VFMV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHD vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHD vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHDVFMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.22

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.85

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

7.06

-1.65

LVHD vs. VFMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the VFMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHD and VFMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHD vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and VFMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHDVFMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-33.64%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-6.00%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-10.35%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

-15.41%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-2.37%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-3.62%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

1.57%

+0.91%

Volatility

LVHD vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.50%. This indicates that LVHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHDVFMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

2.50%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

6.44%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.98%

8.89%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.91%

11.75%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.53%

14.22%

+1.31%

LVHD vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LVHD vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison

LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than VFMV's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LVHD
Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
3.29%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
1.51%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHD and VFMV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVHD has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to VFMV (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs VFMV's -33.64%.

On 5-year performance, VFMV leads with 9.37% vs 7.44% for LVHD. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFMV has performed better with a 9.37% return vs 7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.51% for VFMV.

LVHD is categorized as Dividend, while VFMV is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 0.13% for VFMV.

LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHD and VFMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer