VFMV vs. VIG
VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. VFMV is actively managed, while VIG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFMV returned 9.52%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for VIG. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFMV charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
VFMV vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than VIG's 7.53% return.
VFMV
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 6.47%
- 1Y
- 12.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- —
VIG
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 7.53%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 20.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
VFMV vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 7.16% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -0.34% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.53% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMV and VIG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between VFMV and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
VFMV vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFMV
VIG
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VFMV
VIG
Communication Services
VFMV
VIG
Financial Services
VFMV
VIG
Industrials
VFMV
VIG
Healthcare
VFMV
VIG
Consumer Defensive
VFMV
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
VFMV
VIG
Utilities
VFMV
VIG
Real Estate
VFMV
VIG
-
Energy
VFMV
VIG
Basic Materials
VFMV
-
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMV vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
VFMV
VIG
VFMV vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFMV | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.36 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 2.57 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.84 | 10.39 | -2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFMV vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMV | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -46.81% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.00% | -7.91% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | -14.95% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.41% | -20.39% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -0.62% | -1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.62% | -5.50% | +1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 1.96% | -0.39% |
Volatility
VFMV vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) is 2.50%, while Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that VFMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMV | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 2.82% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.44% | 7.68% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.90% | 10.14% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 14.23% | -2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 16.07% | -1.84% |
VFMV vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFMV has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFMV vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.51% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFMV and VIG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIG has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to VFMV (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMV dropped -33.64% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 5-year performance, VIG leads with 11.07% vs 9.52% for VFMV. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VIG has performed better with a 11.07% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFMV.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.
VFMV is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VIG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMV and 0.04% for VIG.
VIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFMV and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer