PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHD vs. QDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHD vs. QDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHD achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than QDF's 10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, LVHD has underperformed QDF with an annualized return of 8.03%, while QDF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.18% annualized return.


LVHD

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
6.72%
6M
6.51%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
8.03%

QDF

1D
-0.56%
1M
4.60%
YTD
10.70%
6M
10.82%
1Y
27.64%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
12.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHD vs. QDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
6.72%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%-5.58%14.25%
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
10.70%16.58%16.95%19.71%-12.13%26.65%4.86%25.71%-7.97%17.42%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHD and QDF is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2015

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between LVHD and QDF has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LVHD vs. QDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVHD
QDF

Utilities

25.5%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

18.5%
5.5%

Real Estate

15.0%
5.4%

Financial Services

8.6%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
6.9%

Energy

6.7%
0.9%

Technology

5.9%
38.3%

Industrials

4.6%
8.9%

Healthcare

4.6%
8.3%

Communication Services

3.8%
6.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Utilities

LVHD
25.5%
QDF
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

LVHD
18.5%
QDF
5.5%

Real Estate

LVHD
15.0%
QDF
5.4%

Financial Services

LVHD
8.6%
QDF
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

LVHD
6.8%
QDF
6.9%

Energy

LVHD
6.7%
QDF
0.9%

Technology

LVHD
5.9%
QDF
38.3%

Industrials

LVHD
4.6%
QDF
8.9%

Healthcare

LVHD
4.6%
QDF
8.3%

Communication Services

LVHD
3.8%
QDF
6.8%

Basic Materials

LVHD

-

QDF
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHD vs. QDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

QDF
QDF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDF Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDF Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHD vs. QDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LVHDQDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.44

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

3.52

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.98

15.37

-11.39

LVHD vs. QDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHD Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the QDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHD and QDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVHDQDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

2.40

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.77

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.70

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.78

-0.22

Drawdowns

LVHD vs. QDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHD drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, roughly equal to the maximum QDF drawdown of -36.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHD and QDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHDQDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-36.67%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-7.90%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

-18.01%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

-22.06%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-36.67%

-0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.84%

-0.56%

-4.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-3.65%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

1.80%

+0.62%

Volatility

LVHD vs. QDF - Volatility Comparison

Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) have volatilities of 2.86% and 2.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHDQDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

2.95%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.64%

8.76%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

11.60%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

15.60%

-2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.50%

17.39%

-1.89%

LVHD vs. QDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHD has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than QDF's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHD vs. QDF - Dividend Comparison

LVHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, more than QDF's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.40%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%0.00%
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
1.50%1.65%1.93%2.19%2.45%1.90%2.38%3.05%4.29%2.70%3.07%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHD and QDF have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDF has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to LVHD (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHD dropped -37.32% vs QDF's -36.67%.

On 10-year performance, QDF leads with 12.18% vs 8.03% for LVHD. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QDF has performed better with a 12.18% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDF.

LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 1.50% for QDF.

LVHD is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while QDF is Large Cap Value Equities. LVHD tracks QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index, while QDF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for LVHD and 0.37% for QDF.

QDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHD and QDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer