PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDF vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDF vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDF achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, QDF has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 12.04%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 13.71% annualized return.


QDF

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.30%
6M
10.89%
YTD
12.96%
1Y
24.58%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
12.04%
ALL TIME*
12.68%

DGRW

1D
0.49%
1M
0.69%
6M
6.01%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
13.71%
ALL TIME*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.03M$48.50M$56.54M
$1.70M$2.15M$2.21M

QDF vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
12.96%16.58%16.95%19.71%-12.13%26.65%4.86%25.71%-7.97%17.42%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
8.57%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between QDF and DGRW is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.95

The correlation between QDF and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

QDF vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDF
DGRW

Technology

37.0%
33.8%

Financial Services

14.8%
8.4%

Healthcare

9.1%
12.8%

Industrials

8.7%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
6.7%

Real Estate

5.6%

-

Communication Services

5.4%
11.1%

Utilities

2.2%
0.2%

Basic Materials

1.5%
2.8%

Energy

0.9%
4.5%

Technology

QDF
37.0%
DGRW
33.8%

Financial Services

QDF
14.8%
DGRW
8.4%

Healthcare

QDF
9.1%
DGRW
12.8%

Industrials

QDF
8.7%
DGRW
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QDF
7.1%
DGRW
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

QDF
5.7%
DGRW
6.7%

Real Estate

QDF
5.6%
DGRW

-

Communication Services

QDF
5.4%
DGRW
11.1%

Utilities

QDF
2.2%
DGRW
0.2%

Basic Materials

QDF
1.5%
DGRW
2.8%

Energy

QDF
0.9%
DGRW
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDF vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QDF
QDF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QDF vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDFDGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

1.79

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

7.25

+5.43

QDF vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDF Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDF and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDF vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDF drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDF and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDFDGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.67%

-32.04%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-8.30%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.01%

-16.21%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.06%

-17.27%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.67%

-32.04%

-4.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-1.31%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-3.00%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.05%

-0.21%

Volatility

QDF vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) have volatilities of 2.96% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDFDGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

2.92%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

8.33%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

10.44%

+1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

14.01%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

16.18%

+1.19%

QDF vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDF vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

QDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than DGRW's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.28%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
1.48%1.65%1.93%2.19%2.45%1.90%2.38%3.05%4.29%2.70%3.07%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, QDF and DGRW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QDF has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to DGRW (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDF dropped -36.67% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 13.71% vs 12.04% for QDF. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 13.71% return vs 12.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDF.

QDF has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.28% for DGRW.

QDF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDF and 0.28% for DGRW.

QDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDF and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer