PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QDF vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QDF vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QDF achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QDF having a 12.49% annualized return and SCHD not far ahead at 12.68%.


QDF

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.95%
YTD
11.19%
6M
10.56%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
12.49%

SCHD

1D
0.09%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
17.24%
6M
16.44%
1Y
24.06%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QDF vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
11.19%16.58%16.95%19.71%-12.13%26.65%4.86%25.71%-7.97%17.42%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
17.24%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between QDF and SCHD is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2012

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between QDF and SCHD has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QDF vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QDF
SCHD

Technology

39.5%
19.4%

Financial Services

11.5%
9.1%

Healthcare

9.6%
18.4%

Industrials

9.1%
7.4%

Communication Services

7.2%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
18.5%

Real Estate

5.4%

-

Energy

3.4%
14.6%

Utilities

1.8%
0.0%

Basic Materials

0.4%
1.2%

Technology

QDF
39.5%
SCHD
19.4%

Financial Services

QDF
11.5%
SCHD
9.1%

Healthcare

QDF
9.6%
SCHD
18.4%

Industrials

QDF
9.1%
SCHD
7.4%

Communication Services

QDF
7.2%
SCHD
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

QDF
6.4%
SCHD
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

QDF
5.7%
SCHD
18.5%

Real Estate

QDF
5.4%
SCHD

-

Energy

QDF
3.4%
SCHD
14.6%

Utilities

QDF
1.8%
SCHD
0.0%

Basic Materials

QDF
0.4%
SCHD
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QDF vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QDF
QDF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QDF vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QDFSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.39

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

5.24

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.61

12.71

+2.90

QDF vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QDF and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QDF vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QDF drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDF and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QDFSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.67%

-33.37%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.90%

-4.61%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.01%

-16.13%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.06%

-16.85%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.67%

-33.37%

-3.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.33%

-2.86%

+2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-3.31%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.90%

-0.07%

Volatility

QDF vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that QDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QDFSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

3.58%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.32%

7.74%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.00%

11.09%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.65%

14.36%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.42%

16.73%

+0.69%

QDF vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QDF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

QDF vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

QDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than SCHD's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund
1.51%1.65%1.93%2.19%2.45%1.90%2.38%3.05%4.29%2.70%3.07%3.04%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.31%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


QDF and SCHD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDF has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDF dropped -36.67% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.68% vs 12.49% for QDF. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 12.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDF.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.51% for QDF.

QDF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. QDF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDF and 0.06% for SCHD.

QDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QDF and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer