QDF vs. SCHD
QDF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QDF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QDF returned 12.49%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QDF charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
QDF vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDF achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QDF having a 12.49% annualized return and SCHD not far ahead at 12.68%.
QDF
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 11.19%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 28.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 6M
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 24.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
QDF vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund | 11.19% | 16.58% | 16.95% | 19.71% | -12.13% | 26.65% | 4.86% | 25.71% | -7.97% | 17.42% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.24% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDF and SCHD is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2012 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QDF and SCHD has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QDF vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QDF
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
QDF
SCHD
Financial Services
QDF
SCHD
Healthcare
QDF
SCHD
Industrials
QDF
SCHD
Communication Services
QDF
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
QDF
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
QDF
SCHD
Real Estate
QDF
SCHD
-
Energy
QDF
SCHD
Utilities
QDF
SCHD
Basic Materials
QDF
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QDF vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
QDF
SCHD
QDF vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QDF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.39 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 5.24 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.61 | 12.71 | +2.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QDF vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDF drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDF and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.67% | -33.37% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.90% | -4.61% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.01% | -16.13% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | -16.85% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.67% | -33.37% | -3.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -2.86% | +2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -3.31% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 1.90% | -0.07% |
Volatility
QDF vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that QDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QDF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 3.58% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 7.74% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.00% | 11.09% | +0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 14.36% | +1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.42% | 16.73% | +0.69% |
QDF vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
QDF vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
QDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than SCHD's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund | 1.51% | 1.65% | 1.93% | 2.19% | 2.45% | 1.90% | 2.38% | 3.05% | 4.29% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 3.04% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.31% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QDF and SCHD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QDF has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QDF dropped -36.67% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.68% vs 12.49% for QDF. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 12.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDF.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.51% for QDF.
QDF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. QDF tracks Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for QDF and 0.06% for SCHD.
QDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QDF and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer