LVAFX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
LVAFX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 24, 2014. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
LVAFX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LVAFX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund | 4.47% | 22.33% | 16.10% | 9.81% | -4.04% | 17.36% | -5.16% | 17.54% | -6.47% | 18.68% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -0.70% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVAFX achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -0.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LVAFX having a 9.05% annualized return and FASGX not far behind at 8.96%.
LVAFX
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
FASGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LVAFX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVAFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LVAFX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
LVAFX
FASGX
LVAFX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LVAFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 1.41 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 2.01 | +0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 2.00 | +0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.16 | 8.74 | +1.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVAFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.41 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.55 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.71 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.60 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between LVAFX and FASGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LVAFX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
LVAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.74%, more than FASGX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund | 9.74% | 10.17% | 18.36% | 15.64% | 2.90% | 2.90% | 2.14% | 7.62% | 3.59% | 7.10% | 1.66% | 1.74% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.39% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
LVAFX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVAFX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVAFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.69% | -47.35% | +13.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -9.07% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.34% | -23.54% | +5.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.69% | -27.20% | -6.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.87% | -5.77% | +1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -6.74% | +2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 2.07% | -0.14% |
Volatility
LVAFX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) is 3.42%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that LVAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LVAFX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 5.30% | -1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.26% | 8.12% | -1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.17% | 13.00% | -1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.73% | 12.18% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.33% | 12.58% | +0.75% |