PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVAFX vs. GLIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVAFX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVAFX achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than GLIFX's 7.23% return. Over the past 10 years, LVAFX has underperformed GLIFX with an annualized return of 8.18%, while GLIFX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.98% annualized return.


LVAFX

1D
-0.23%
1M
5.48%
6M
12.25%
YTD
17.07%
1Y
29.35%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
8.18%
ALL TIME*
7.55%

GLIFX

1D
-0.47%
1M
-1.55%
6M
3.86%
YTD
7.23%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
13.42%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
9.98%
ALL TIME*
10.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LVAFX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVAFX
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund
17.07%22.33%0.10%9.81%-4.04%17.36%-5.16%17.54%-6.47%18.68%
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.23%23.85%6.71%10.89%-1.33%19.91%-4.51%22.27%-3.82%20.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LVAFX and GLIFX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between LVAFX and GLIFX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVAFX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LVAFX
LVAFX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LVAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

GLIFX
GLIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GLIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LVAFX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVAFXGLIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.23

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.10

1.54

+3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.24

4.18

+14.06

LVAFX vs. GLIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVAFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is higher than the GLIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVAFX and GLIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVAFX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, which is greater than GLIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVAFX and GLIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVAFXGLIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.69%

-29.65%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.76%

-9.00%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.52%

-9.00%

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.34%

-17.15%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

-29.65%

-4.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-5.88%

+5.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-3.38%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

3.31%

-1.70%

Volatility

LVAFX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) is 1.96%, while Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that LVAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVAFXGLIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

2.80%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.55%

9.46%

-2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.49%

10.87%

-2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.23%

11.00%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.53%

13.18%

+0.35%

LVAFX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVAFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVAFX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison

LVAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.69%, more than GLIFX's 7.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLIFX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares
7.32%6.22%4.26%2.95%14.81%6.21%2.59%4.44%14.29%6.94%1.91%11.33%
LVAFX
LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund
8.69%10.17%2.71%15.64%2.90%2.90%2.14%7.62%3.59%7.10%1.66%1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVAFX and GLIFX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLIFX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to LVAFX (1.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVAFX dropped -33.69% vs GLIFX's -29.65%.

LVAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVAFX and GLIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer