LVAFX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
LVAFX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 24, 2014. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
LVAFX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LVAFX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund | 4.47% | 22.33% | 16.10% | 9.81% | -4.04% | 17.36% | -5.16% | 17.54% | -6.47% | 18.68% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVAFX achieves a 4.47% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LVAFX having a 9.05% annualized return and FGIAX not far behind at 8.78%.
LVAFX
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 19.38%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LVAFX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVAFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LVAFX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
LVAFX
FGIAX
LVAFX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LVAFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 1.79 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | 2.30 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 2.73 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.16 | 12.62 | -2.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVAFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.79 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.80 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.58 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.42 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between LVAFX and FGIAX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LVAFX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
LVAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.74%, more than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund | 9.74% | 10.17% | 18.36% | 15.64% | 2.90% | 2.90% | 2.14% | 7.62% | 3.59% | 7.10% | 1.66% | 1.74% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
LVAFX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.69%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVAFX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVAFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.69% | -49.35% | +15.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -8.29% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.34% | -21.08% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.69% | -38.02% | +4.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.87% | -3.06% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -7.22% | +2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 1.79% | +0.14% |
Volatility
LVAFX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) is 3.42%, while Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that LVAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LVAFX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 4.15% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.26% | 7.07% | -0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.17% | 12.28% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.73% | 13.08% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.33% | 15.17% | -1.84% |