PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRNZ vs. VYMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRNZ vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRNZ achieves a 29.07% return, which is significantly higher than VYMI's 11.99% return.


LRNZ

1D
-1.41%
1M
29.38%
YTD
29.07%
6M
29.15%
1Y
45.73%
3Y*
24.70%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*

VYMI

1D
0.61%
1M
1.65%
YTD
11.99%
6M
15.12%
1Y
30.78%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
10.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRNZ vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LRNZ
TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF
29.07%22.27%2.01%67.11%-51.46%-0.96%87.82%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
11.99%38.05%7.06%17.07%-7.02%15.39%10.59%

Correlation

The correlation between LRNZ and VYMI is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020

0.40

The correlation between LRNZ and VYMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LRNZ vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LRNZ
VYMI

Technology

78.4%
4.3%

Healthcare

16.3%
6.6%

Communication Services

5.3%
4.0%

Basic Materials

-

6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.0%

Energy

-

9.5%

Financial Services

-

41.9%

Industrials

-

6.6%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Utilities

-

5.6%

Technology

LRNZ
78.4%
VYMI
4.3%

Healthcare

LRNZ
16.3%
VYMI
6.6%

Communication Services

LRNZ
5.3%
VYMI
4.0%

Basic Materials

LRNZ

-

VYMI
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

LRNZ

-

VYMI
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

LRNZ

-

VYMI
7.0%

Energy

LRNZ

-

VYMI
9.5%

Financial Services

LRNZ

-

VYMI
41.9%

Industrials

LRNZ

-

VYMI
6.6%

Real Estate

LRNZ

-

VYMI
1.3%

Utilities

LRNZ

-

VYMI
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRNZ vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRNZ
LRNZ Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LRNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
LRNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

VYMI
VYMI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VYMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYMI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VYMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYMI Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRNZ vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LRNZVYMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

3.05

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

12.01

-7.82

LRNZ vs. VYMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRNZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the VYMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRNZ and VYMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRNZVYMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

2.39

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.82

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.65

-0.25

Drawdowns

LRNZ vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, which is greater than VYMI's maximum drawdown of -40.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and VYMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRNZVYMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.33%

-40.00%

-21.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.89%

-10.14%

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.10%

-12.84%

-20.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.33%

-24.05%

-37.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.94%

-0.80%

-3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.65%

-6.31%

-20.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.94%

2.57%

+8.37%

Volatility

LRNZ vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) at 3.96%. This indicates that LRNZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRNZVYMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

3.96%

+6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.24%

10.74%

+12.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.90%

12.94%

+15.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.26%

14.84%

+22.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.63%

16.87%

+20.76%

LRNZ vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

LRNZ vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison

LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VYMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LRNZ
TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF
3.42%3.68%4.84%4.58%4.70%4.30%3.22%4.20%4.29%3.21%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


LRNZ and VYMI have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LRNZ has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to VYMI (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRNZ dropped -61.33% vs VYMI's -40.00%.

On 5-year performance, VYMI leads with 12.09% vs 8.37% for LRNZ. On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VYMI has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VYMI has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for LRNZ.

VYMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

LRNZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VYMI is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LRNZ and 0.07% for VYMI.

VYMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRNZ and VYMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer