PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRNZ vs. SPIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRNZ vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LRNZ

1D
-3.48%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPIT

1D
-1.56%
1M
-1.75%
6M
14.70%
YTD
25.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRNZ vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LRNZ and SPIT is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRNZ vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LRNZ vs. SPIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LRNZ vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -5.22%, smaller than the maximum SPIT drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and SPIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRNZSPITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-12.49%

+7.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.22%

-7.05%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-2.56%

+0.32%

Volatility

LRNZ vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRNZSPITDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.71%

26.27%

+10.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.71%

26.27%

+10.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.71%

26.27%

+10.44%

LRNZ vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

LRNZ vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison

LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LRNZ and SPIT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LRNZ and 0.89% for SPIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRNZ and SPIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer