SPIT vs. ZHOG
SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) and ZHOG (F/m Opportunistic Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPIT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by F/m, while ZHOG is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by F/m. Both are actively managed. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SPIT charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for ZHOG.
Performance
SPIT vs. ZHOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPIT achieves a 24.45% return, which is significantly higher than ZHOG's 0.84% return.
SPIT
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -5.03%
- 6M
- 16.23%
- YTD
- 24.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ZHOG
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $242.68K | $282.09K | $201.11K | |
| $58.62K | $55.64K | $69.45K |
SPIT vs. ZHOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 24.45% | 5.31% |
ZHOG F/m Opportunistic Income ETF | 0.84% | 1.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPIT and ZHOG is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPIT vs. ZHOG — Risk / Return Rank
SPIT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZHOG
SPIT vs. ZHOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPIT | ZHOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPIT vs. ZHOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPIT drawdown since its inception was -12.49%, which is greater than ZHOG's maximum drawdown of -3.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIT and ZHOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPIT | ZHOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.49% | -3.66% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -0.54% | -7.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -0.67% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.32% | — |
Volatility
SPIT vs. ZHOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPIT | ZHOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.59% | 1.62% | +24.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.59% | 3.93% | +22.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.59% | 3.93% | +22.66% |
SPIT vs. ZHOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPIT has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ZHOG's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPIT vs. ZHOG - Dividend Comparison
SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than ZHOG's 5.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.77% | 7.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZHOG F/m Opportunistic Income ETF | 5.04% | 5.35% | 5.50% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPIT and ZHOG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZHOG is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZHOG is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 5.04% for ZHOG.
SPIT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ZHOG is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SPIT and 0.43% for ZHOG.
Find the right allocation for SPIT and ZHOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer