PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPIT vs. ZHOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPIT vs. ZHOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPIT achieves a 30.41% return, which is significantly higher than ZHOG's 0.75% return.


SPIT

1D
-0.18%
1M
4.82%
YTD
30.41%
6M
28.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZHOG

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.75%
6M
0.84%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPIT vs. ZHOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SPIT
F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF
30.41%5.31%
ZHOG
F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
0.75%1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SPIT and ZHOG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPIT vs. ZHOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPIT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ZHOG
ZHOG Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ZHOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZHOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZHOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZHOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZHOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPIT vs. ZHOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPITZHOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.83

SPIT vs. ZHOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPIT vs. ZHOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPIT drawdown since its inception was -12.49%, which is greater than ZHOG's maximum drawdown of -3.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPIT and ZHOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPITZHOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.49%

-3.66%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.28%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-0.69%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

Volatility

SPIT vs. ZHOG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPITZHOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.60%

1.59%

+25.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.60%

3.98%

+22.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.60%

3.98%

+22.62%

SPIT vs. ZHOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPIT has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ZHOG's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPIT vs. ZHOG - Dividend Comparison

SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than ZHOG's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
SPIT
F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF
5.51%7.18%0.00%0.00%
ZHOG
F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
5.12%5.35%5.50%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPIT and ZHOG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZHOG is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZHOG is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.51%, compared with 5.12% for ZHOG.

SPIT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ZHOG is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SPIT and 0.43% for ZHOG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPIT and ZHOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer