LRNZ vs. SGRT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRNZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

LRNZ vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRNZ achieves a 30.91% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.

LRNZ

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: 33.80%
• YTD: 30.91%
• 6M: 29.93%
• 1Y: 47.93%
• 3Y*: 26.33%
• 5Y*: 8.67%
• 10Y*: —

SGRT

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 14.68%
• YTD: 51.46%
• 6M: 56.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRNZ vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	30.91%	15.16%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	51.46%	25.25%

Correlation

The correlation between LRNZ and SGRT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

LRNZ vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRNZ

LRNZ Risk / Return Rank: 41
LRNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
LRNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
LRNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 43
LRNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
LRNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRNZ vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LRNZ	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.40	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRNZ	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	3.81	-3.39

Drawdowns

LRNZ vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRNZ	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.33%	-17.87%	-43.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.56%	0.00%	-2.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.67%	-3.11%	-23.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LRNZ	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.33%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.25%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.88%	33.41%	-4.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.26%	33.41%	+3.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.64%	33.41%	+4.23%

LRNZ vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRNZ vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRNZ and SGRT in my portfolio?

LRNZ and SGRT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LRNZ or SGRT?

On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRNZ or SGRT?

SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for LRNZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRNZ or SGRT?

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

What is the main difference between LRNZ and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LRNZ and 0.59% for SGRT.