SGRT vs. KEAT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) and KEAT (Keating Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGRT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund, while KEAT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Keating. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGRT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for KEAT.

Performance

SGRT vs. KEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGRT achieves a 53.66% return, which is significantly higher than KEAT's 5.33% return.

SGRT

• 1D: 2.84%
• 1M: 9.93%
• YTD: 53.66%
• 6M: 49.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KEAT

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -4.84%
• YTD: 5.33%
• 6M: 4.64%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGRT vs. KEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	53.66%	26.83%
KEAT Keating Active ETF	5.33%	10.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SGRT and KEAT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.32

Return for Risk

SGRT vs. KEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KEAT

KEAT Risk / Return Rank: 50
KEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
KEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
KEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 53
KEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
KEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGRT vs. KEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SGRT	KEAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.80	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.44	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.12	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.21	—

Drawdowns

SGRT vs. KEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGRT drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, which is greater than KEAT's maximum drawdown of -9.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGRT and KEAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGRT	KEAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.87%	-9.13%	-8.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-9.13%	+9.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.20%	-1.69%	-1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SGRT	KEAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.90%	10.74%	+24.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.90%	10.41%	+24.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.90%	10.41%	+24.49%

SGRT vs. KEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGRT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KEAT's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGRT vs. KEAT - Dividend Comparison

SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than KEAT's 2.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
KEAT Keating Active ETF	2.33%	2.48%	1.72%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.10%	0.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGRT and KEAT in my portfolio?

SGRT and KEAT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SGRT or KEAT?

On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGRT or KEAT?

SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for KEAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SGRT or KEAT?

KEAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.10% for SGRT.

What is the main difference between SGRT and KEAT?

SGRT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while KEAT is Global Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SGRT and 0.85% for KEAT.