LRNZ vs. GARY
LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LRNZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.
Performance
LRNZ vs. GARY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LRNZ
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GARY
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- 6M
- 21.92%
- YTD
- 29.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRNZ vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | -5.22% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | -2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRNZ and GARY is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRNZ vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRNZ vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -5.22%, smaller than the maximum GARY drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and GARY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRNZ | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -10.28% | +5.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.22% | -5.64% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -1.93% | -0.31% |
Volatility
LRNZ vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRNZ | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.71% | 21.74% | +14.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.71% | 21.74% | +14.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.71% | 21.74% | +14.97% |
LRNZ vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRNZ vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison
LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% |
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, LRNZ and GARY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.
GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.
They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LRNZ and 0.77% for GARY.
Find the right allocation for LRNZ and GARY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer