PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRNZ vs. GARY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRNZ vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LRNZ

1D
-3.48%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GARY

1D
-1.27%
1M
-0.99%
6M
21.92%
YTD
29.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRNZ vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LRNZ and GARY is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRNZ vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LRNZ vs. GARY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LRNZ vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -5.22%, smaller than the maximum GARY drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and GARY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRNZGARYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-10.28%

+5.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.22%

-5.64%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-1.93%

-0.31%

Volatility

LRNZ vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRNZGARYDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.71%

21.74%

+14.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.71%

21.74%

+14.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.71%

21.74%

+14.97%

LRNZ vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

LRNZ vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.


PositionTTM2025
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
0.04%0.05%
LRNZ
TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, LRNZ and GARY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.

They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LRNZ and 0.77% for GARY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRNZ and GARY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer