LRNZ vs. EMLP
LRNZ (TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF) and EMLP (First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LRNZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrueMark Investments, while EMLP is a MLPs fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. LRNZ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for EMLP.
Performance
LRNZ vs. EMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LRNZ
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMLP
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 15.07%
- YTD
- 18.66%
- 1Y
- 22.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
LRNZ vs. EMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | -5.22% |
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRNZ and EMLP is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | -0.50 |
LRNZ vs. EMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LRNZ
EMLP
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
LRNZ
EMLP
-
Healthcare
LRNZ
EMLP
-
Communication Services
LRNZ
EMLP
-
Basic Materials
LRNZ
-
EMLP
Consumer Cyclical
LRNZ
-
EMLP
-
Consumer Defensive
LRNZ
-
EMLP
-
Energy
LRNZ
-
EMLP
Financial Services
LRNZ
-
EMLP
-
Industrials
LRNZ
-
EMLP
Real Estate
LRNZ
-
EMLP
-
Utilities
LRNZ
-
EMLP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRNZ vs. EMLP — Risk / Return Rank
LRNZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMLP
LRNZ vs. EMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRNZ | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRNZ vs. EMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -5.22%, smaller than the maximum EMLP drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and EMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRNZ | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -43.61% | +38.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.22% | -0.23% | -4.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -5.73% | +3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.72% | — |
Volatility
LRNZ vs. EMLP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRNZ | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.71% | 10.33% | +26.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.71% | 14.54% | +22.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.71% | 17.68% | +19.03% |
LRNZ vs. EMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRNZ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLP's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRNZ vs. EMLP - Dividend Comparison
LRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 2.74% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.92% | 3.15% | 3.29% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.71% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 4.63% |
LRNZ TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRNZ and EMLP have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for EMLP.
EMLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 0.00% for LRNZ.
LRNZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EMLP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for LRNZ and 0.96% for EMLP.
Find the right allocation for LRNZ and EMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer