PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMLP vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMLP vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMLP achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, EMLP has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 10.13%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.


EMLP

1D
0.47%
1M
-3.16%
YTD
14.75%
6M
15.27%
1Y
19.48%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*
10.13%

SPY

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.09%
YTD
9.74%
6M
9.27%
1Y
26.65%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*
15.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMLP vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
14.75%9.67%33.39%8.05%10.39%23.20%-13.36%23.40%-8.70%1.07%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
9.74%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between EMLP and SPY is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2012

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between EMLP and SPY has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EMLP vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMLP
SPY

Utilities

54.0%
2.1%

Energy

27.0%
3.1%

Industrials

7.9%
7.8%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Financial Services

-

11.1%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

39.0%

Utilities

EMLP
54.0%
SPY
2.1%

Energy

EMLP
27.0%
SPY
3.1%

Industrials

EMLP
7.9%
SPY
7.8%

Basic Materials

EMLP
1.6%
SPY
1.7%

Communication Services

EMLP

-

SPY
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EMLP

-

SPY
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

EMLP

-

SPY
4.5%

Financial Services

EMLP

-

SPY
11.1%

Healthcare

EMLP

-

SPY
8.3%

Real Estate

EMLP

-

SPY
1.8%

Technology

EMLP

-

SPY
39.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMLP vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMLP
EMLP Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
EMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
EMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMLP vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMLPSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

3.01

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

13.54

-1.96

EMLP vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMLP and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMLP vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMLP drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLP and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMLPSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.61%

-55.19%

+11.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.94%

-8.88%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.47%

-18.76%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.59%

-24.50%

+9.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.61%

-33.72%

-9.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

-1.75%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-9.04%

+3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.97%

-0.28%

Volatility

EMLP vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) is 3.42%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that EMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMLPSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

4.64%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

9.75%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.92%

12.43%

-2.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

17.14%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

17.99%

-0.30%

EMLP vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMLP has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMLP vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

EMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
2.79%3.18%3.19%3.92%3.15%3.29%4.70%3.71%4.71%3.80%3.62%4.63%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMLP and SPY have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPY has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to EMLP (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMLP dropped -43.61% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs 10.13% for EMLP. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EMLP has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 10.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for EMLP.

EMLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.

EMLP is categorized as MLPs, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for EMLP and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMLP and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer