LRGE vs. GQGU
LRGE (ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. LRGE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
LRGE vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRGE achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly lower than GQGU's 6.60% return.
LRGE
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 5.35%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 13.78%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRGE vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | 5.35% | 4.07% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 6.60% | -1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRGE and GQGU is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRGE vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
LRGE
GQGU
LRGE vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LRGE | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRGE | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.60 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
LRGE vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRGE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGE and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRGE | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -6.65% | -30.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | -4.66% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -2.54% | -4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | — | — |
Volatility
LRGE vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRGE | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.44% | 10.14% | +6.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 10.14% | +10.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 10.14% | +10.47% |
LRGE vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRGE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRGE vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
LRGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than GQGU's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.11% | 2.02% | 1.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 2.10% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRGE and GQGU have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for LRGE.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.12% for LRGE.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LRGE and 0.49% for GQGU.
Find the right allocation for LRGE and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer