LRGE vs. HUM
LRGE (ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while HUM (Humana Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, LRGE returned 10.94%/yr vs -4.20%/yr for HUM. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LRGE vs. HUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRGE achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly lower than HUM's 28.53% return.
LRGE
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 5.35%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 13.78%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- —
HUM
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- 37.64%
- YTD
- 28.53%
- 6M
- 28.57%
- 1Y
- 42.54%
- 3Y*
- -13.29%
- 5Y*
- -4.20%
- 10Y*
- 6.70%
LRGE vs. HUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | 5.35% | 9.54% | 26.32% | 46.36% | -31.45% | 22.93% | 31.89% | 33.38% | -0.38% | 16.00% |
HUM Humana Inc. | 28.53% | 2.36% | -43.96% | -9.94% | 11.15% | 13.80% | 12.71% | 28.94% | 16.27% | 7.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRGE and HUM is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2017 | 0.24 |
The correlation between LRGE and HUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRGE vs. HUM — Risk / Return Rank
LRGE
HUM
LRGE vs. HUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and Humana Inc. (HUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LRGE | HUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 0.87 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 1.37 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.20 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 0.91 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.50 | 1.87 | +0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRGE | HUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.87 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | -0.11 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.22 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
LRGE vs. HUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRGE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, smaller than the maximum HUM drawdown of -85.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGE and HUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRGE | HUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -85.10% | +48.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.32% | -47.18% | +30.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.26% | -67.92% | +47.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.03% | -69.92% | +32.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | -39.49% | +37.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -27.15% | +19.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 22.79% | -17.27% |
Volatility
LRGE vs. HUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) is 4.31%, while Humana Inc. (HUM) has a volatility of 15.20%. This indicates that LRGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRGE | HUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 15.20% | -10.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 38.83% | -26.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.44% | 48.96% | -32.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 37.37% | -16.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 34.59% | -13.98% |
Dividends
LRGE vs. HUM - Dividend Comparison
LRGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than HUM's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUM Humana Inc. | 1.08% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 0.77% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.64% |
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.11% | 2.02% | 1.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 2.10% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRGE and HUM have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUM has higher volatility (15.20%) compared to LRGE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGE dropped -37.03% vs HUM's -85.10%.
HUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRGE and HUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer