LRGE vs. FNGU
Compare and contrast key facts about ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).
LRGE and FNGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LRGE is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on May 22, 2017. FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LRGE or FNGU.
Key characteristics
| LRGE | FNGU | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 25.83% | 98.03% |
| 1Y Return | 46.74% | 217.32% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.26% | 3.73% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 17.27% | 65.76% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.03 | 2.77 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.98 | 2.80 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.54 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.51 | 2.71 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.80 | 11.88 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.26% | 16.77% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.74% | 71.68% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.03% | -92.34% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -17.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRGE and FNGU is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LRGE vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LRGE achieves a 25.83% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 98.03% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LRGE vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRGE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LRGE vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LRGE vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison
LRGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | 0.09% | 0.11% | 2.01% | 1.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 2.14% | 0.37% |
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LRGE vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRGE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGE and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LRGE vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) is 3.32%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 13.34%. This indicates that LRGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.