LRGE vs. FNGU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LRGE (ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - LRGE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FNGU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). LRGE is actively managed, while FNGU is passively managed. Over the past year, LRGE returned 13.78% vs 64.67% for FNGU. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LRGE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

LRGE vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGE achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 36.18% return.

LRGE

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: 5.34%
• YTD: 5.35%
• 6M: 5.15%
• 1Y: 13.78%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: 10.94%
• 10Y*: —

FNGU

• 1D: -3.75%
• 1M: 33.96%
• YTD: 36.18%
• 6M: 16.22%
• 1Y: 64.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGE vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF	5.35%	5.58%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN	36.18%	4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGE and FNGU is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.87

The correlation between LRGE and FNGU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

LRGE vs. FNGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LRGE	FNGU
Technology	44.5%	60.6%
Consumer Cyclical	18.7%	9.6%
Communication Services	11.3%	29.8%
Financial Services	8.7%	-
Healthcare	6.5%	-
Industrials	5.5%	-
Basic Materials	2.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.9%	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LRGE vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGE

LRGE Risk / Return Rank: 22
LRGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
LRGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
LRGE Omega Ratio Rank: 23
LRGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
LRGE Martin Ratio Rank: 21

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 27
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGE vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LRGE	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	1.13	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	1.69	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.21	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	1.09	-0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.50	2.64	-0.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LRGE vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGE Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGE and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRGE	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	1.13	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.40	+0.35

Drawdowns

LRGE vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -60.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGE and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRGE	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.03%	-60.84%	+23.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.32%	-59.55%	+43.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.07%	-4.84%	+2.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.20%	-22.06%	+14.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.52%	24.57%	-19.05%

Volatility

LRGE vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) is 4.31%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 16.40%. This indicates that LRGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRGE	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	16.40%	-12.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.50%	44.77%	-32.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.44%	57.50%	-41.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.68%	78.60%	-57.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.61%	78.60%	-57.99%

LRGE vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRGE vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

LRGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF	0.12%	0.13%	0.18%	0.11%	2.02%	1.20%	0.37%	0.37%	2.10%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRGE and FNGU in my portfolio?

LRGE and FNGU have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LRGE or FNGU?

FNGU has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to LRGE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGE dropped -37.03% vs FNGU's -60.84%.

Which ETF is better, LRGE or FNGU?

On 1-year performance, FNGU leads with 64.67% vs 13.78% for LRGE. On fees, LRGE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, LRGE has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LRGE or FNGU?

Over the 1-year period, FNGU has performed better with a 64.67% return vs 13.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRGE or FNGU?

LRGE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRGE or FNGU?

LRGE has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between LRGE and FNGU?

LRGE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FNGU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LRGE and 0.95% for FNGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.