PortfoliosLab logo
LRGE vs. FNGU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LRGE and FNGU is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

LRGE vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
148.72%
707.25%
LRGE
FNGU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LRGE:

0.48

FNGU:

0.33

Sortino Ratio

LRGE:

0.80

FNGU:

1.14

Omega Ratio

LRGE:

1.11

FNGU:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

LRGE:

0.48

FNGU:

0.56

Martin Ratio

LRGE:

1.73

FNGU:

1.34

Ulcer Index

LRGE:

5.66%

FNGU:

26.37%

Daily Std Dev

LRGE:

20.66%

FNGU:

93.41%

Max Drawdown

LRGE:

-37.03%

FNGU:

-92.34%

Current Drawdown

LRGE:

-8.37%

FNGU:

-37.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGE achieves a -4.20% return, which is significantly higher than FNGU's -25.93% return.


LRGE

YTD

-4.20%

1M

14.90%

6M

-5.79%

1Y

9.83%

5Y*

14.92%

10Y*

N/A

FNGU

YTD

-25.93%

1M

67.17%

6M

-17.38%

1Y

30.52%

5Y*

44.85%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LRGE vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LRGE vs. FNGU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LRGE is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LRGE is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LRGE is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LRGE is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LRGE is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LRGE is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FNGU is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FNGU is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FNGU is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FNGU is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FNGU is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FNGU is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LRGE vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LRGE Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGE and FNGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.48
0.33
LRGE
FNGU

Dividends

LRGE vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

LRGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
LRGE
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF
0.18%0.18%0.11%2.02%1.20%0.37%0.37%2.14%0.37%
FNGU
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LRGE vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, smaller than the maximum FNGU drawdown of -92.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGE and FNGU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.37%
-37.80%
LRGE
FNGU

Volatility

LRGE vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) is 11.07%, while MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a volatility of 43.48%. This indicates that LRGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.07%
43.48%
LRGE
FNGU