LRGE vs. BCD
LRGE (ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF) and BCD (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRGE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while BCD is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, LRGE returned 10.94%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for BCD. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LRGE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BCD.
Performance
LRGE vs. BCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRGE achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly lower than BCD's 20.45% return.
LRGE
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 5.35%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 13.78%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.94%
- 10Y*
- —
BCD
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 20.45%
- 6M
- 20.51%
- 1Y
- 31.80%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.98%
- 10Y*
- —
LRGE vs. BCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | 5.35% | 9.54% | 26.32% | 46.36% | -31.45% | 22.93% | 31.89% | 33.38% | -0.38% | 16.00% |
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 20.45% | 15.71% | 6.20% | -7.58% | 18.38% | 31.87% | 4.76% | 7.34% | -8.65% | 5.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRGE and BCD is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2017 | 0.20 |
The correlation between LRGE and BCD shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRGE vs. BCD — Risk / Return Rank
LRGE
BCD
LRGE vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LRGE | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.43 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 4.42 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.50 | 12.57 | -10.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRGE | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 2.33 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.78 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.67 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
LRGE vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRGE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, which is greater than BCD's maximum drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGE and BCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRGE | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -29.81% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.32% | -7.22% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.26% | -10.50% | -9.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.03% | -23.03% | -14.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | -3.60% | +1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -9.86% | +2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | 2.54% | +2.98% |
Volatility
LRGE vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRGE | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.33% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 11.74% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.44% | 13.72% | +2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 15.41% | +5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 13.90% | +6.71% |
LRGE vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRGE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRGE vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison
LRGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than BCD's 14.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.29% | 17.21% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.11% | 2.02% | 1.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 2.10% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRGE and BCD have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCD has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to LRGE (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGE dropped -37.03% vs BCD's -29.81%.
On 5-year performance, BCD leads with 11.98% vs 10.94% for LRGE. On fees, BCD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BCD has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 10.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BCD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for LRGE.
BCD has the higher dividend yield at 14.29%, compared with 0.12% for LRGE.
LRGE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BCD is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for LRGE and 0.29% for BCD.
BCD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRGE and BCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer