LRGE vs. FLCH
Compare and contrast key facts about ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH).
LRGE and FLCH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LRGE is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on May 22, 2017. FLCH is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017.
Performance
LRGE vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LRGE vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | -8.00% | 9.54% | 26.32% | 46.36% | -31.45% | 22.93% | 31.89% | 33.38% | -0.38% | 5.75% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | -5.65% | 32.55% | 18.00% | -11.21% | -22.74% | -20.87% | 30.09% | 24.32% | -19.52% | 0.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRGE achieves a -8.00% return, which is significantly lower than FLCH's -5.65% return.
LRGE
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -4.54%
- YTD
- -8.00%
- 6M
- -9.55%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCH
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -5.65%
- 6M
- -12.56%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- -4.85%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LRGE vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRGE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LRGE vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank
LRGE
FLCH
LRGE vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LRGE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 0.32 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.69 | 0.59 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.08 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 0.45 | +0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 1.29 | +0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRGE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 0.32 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | -0.16 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.02 | +0.66 |
Correlation
The correlation between LRGE and FLCH is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LRGE vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison
LRGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than FLCH's 2.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGE ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF | 0.14% | 0.13% | 0.18% | 0.11% | 2.02% | 1.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 2.10% | 0.37% |
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF | 2.50% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 2.69% | 1.48% | 0.91% | 1.98% | 1.92% | 0.01% |
Drawdowns
LRGE vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRGE drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGE and FLCH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRGE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -62.09% | +25.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.32% | -16.65% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.03% | -56.06% | +19.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.66% | -33.49% | +20.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -30.50% | +23.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.31% | 6.02% | -0.71% |
Volatility
LRGE vs. FLCH - Volatility Comparison
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) at 6.44%. This indicates that LRGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LRGE | FLCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 6.44% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.20% | 13.92% | -0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.95% | 23.03% | -2.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 29.58% | -8.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 28.06% | -7.38% |