LQDT vs. GLXY
Compare and contrast key facts about Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd (GLXY).
Performance
LQDT vs. GLXY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LQDT vs. GLXY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc. | 0.86% | 23.66% |
GLXY Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd | -17.49% | -1.93% |
Fundamentals
LQDT:
$987.27M
GLXY:
$71.81B
LQDT:
$0.92
GLXY:
$0.12
LQDT:
33.24
GLXY:
160.26
LQDT:
2.08
GLXY:
0.66
LQDT:
4.59
GLXY:
37.31
LQDT:
$475.56M
GLXY:
$60.26B
LQDT:
$158.65M
GLXY:
$49.74B
LQDT:
$48.97M
GLXY:
$13.26B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDT achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly higher than GLXY's -17.49% return.
LQDT
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- -1.42%
- 3Y*
- 32.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 19.47%
GLXY
- 1D
- 7.58%
- 1M
- -10.39%
- YTD
- -17.49%
- 6M
- -45.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDT vs. GLXY — Risk / Return Rank
LQDT
GLXY
LQDT vs. GLXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd (GLXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQDT | GLXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.23 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQDT | GLXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | -0.24 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDT and GLXY is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LQDT vs. GLXY - Dividend Comparison
Neither LQDT nor GLXY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LQDT vs. GLXY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDT drawdown since its inception was -95.31%, which is greater than GLXY's maximum drawdown of -60.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDT and GLXY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDT | GLXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.31% | -60.71% | -34.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.16% | -56.95% | +3.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.35% | -26.02% | -36.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.39% | — | — |
Volatility
LQDT vs. GLXY - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LQDT | GLXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.29% | 89.97% | -50.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.11% | 89.97% | -40.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.31% | 89.97% | -36.66% |
Financials
LQDT vs. GLXY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidity Services, Inc. and Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LQDT vs. GLXY - Profitability Comparison
LQDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GLXY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of -88.68M and revenue of 10.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -0.9%.
LQDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.37M and revenue of 121.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.
GLXY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of -224.31M and revenue of 10.22B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.
LQDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a net income of 7.49M and revenue of 121.22M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
GLXY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd reported a net income of -195.42M and revenue of 10.22B, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.