LQDT vs. MATW
LQDT (Liquidity Services, Inc.) and MATW (Matthews International Corporation) are both stocks. LQDT operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while MATW operates in Conglomerates (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LQDT returned 17.71%/yr vs -4.38%/yr for MATW. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LQDT vs. MATW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDT achieves a 23.79% return, which is significantly higher than MATW's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, LQDT has outperformed MATW with an annualized return of 17.71%, while MATW has yielded a comparatively lower -4.38% annualized return.
LQDT
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 8.97%
- YTD
- 23.79%
- 6M
- 21.66%
- 1Y
- 60.96%
- 3Y*
- 34.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.29%
- 10Y*
- 17.71%
MATW
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 29.23%
- 3Y*
- -9.69%
- 5Y*
- -2.96%
- 10Y*
- -4.38%
LQDT vs. MATW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc. | 23.79% | -6.13% | 87.62% | 22.40% | -36.32% | 38.78% | 166.95% | -3.40% | 27.22% | -50.26% |
MATW Matthews International Corporation | 1.87% | -1.50% | -21.25% | 23.36% | -14.50% | 27.72% | -20.49% | -3.95% | -21.88% | -30.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDT and MATW is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2006 | 0.32 |
The correlation between LQDT and MATW shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (10 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LQDT:
$0.93
MATW:
$0.41
LQDT:
40.14
MATW:
63.04
LQDT:
2.53
MATW:
0.51
LQDT:
$479.92M
MATW:
$1.21B
LQDT:
$111.22M
MATW:
$432.86M
LQDT:
$52.91M
MATW:
$201.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDT vs. MATW — Risk / Return Rank
LQDT
MATW
LQDT vs. MATW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Matthews International Corporation (MATW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LQDT | MATW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.17 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 1.85 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.27 | 4.26 | +4.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LQDT vs. MATW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDT drawdown since its inception was -95.31%, which is greater than MATW's maximum drawdown of -75.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDT and MATW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDT | MATW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.31% | -75.27% | -20.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.53% | -15.87% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.08% | -58.68% | +17.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.57% | -58.68% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.78% | -75.27% | +2.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.51% | -55.94% | +13.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.17% | -24.75% | -37.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.39% | 6.88% | +0.51% |
Volatility
LQDT vs. MATW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) is 7.97%, while Matthews International Corporation (MATW) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that LQDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MATW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDT | MATW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 8.62% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.75% | 21.67% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.94% | 33.95% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.94% | 36.34% | +8.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.11% | 36.97% | +16.14% |
Dividends
LQDT vs. MATW - Dividend Comparison
LQDT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MATW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MATW Matthews International Corporation | 3.89% | 3.85% | 4.37% | 2.54% | 2.92% | 2.36% | 2.87% | 2.12% | 1.90% | 1.33% | 0.81% | 1.01% |
Financials
LQDT vs. MATW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidity Services, Inc. and Matthews International Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LQDT vs. MATW - Profitability Comparison
LQDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of -54.45M and revenue of 120.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -45.1%.
MATW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported a gross profit of 101.98M and revenue of 258.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
LQDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.62M and revenue of 120.73M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.
MATW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported an operating income of -3.18M and revenue of 258.62M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.2%.
LQDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a net income of 7.52M and revenue of 120.73M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
MATW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported a net income of -21.83M and revenue of 258.62M, resulting in a net margin of -8.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDT and MATW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MATW has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to LQDT (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDT dropped -95.31% vs MATW's -75.27%.
LQDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQDT and MATW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer