PortfoliosLab logo
LQDT vs. MATW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LQDT and MATW is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LQDT vs. MATW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Matthews International Corporation (MATW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LQDT:

0.41

MATW:

-0.44

Sortino Ratio

LQDT:

1.11

MATW:

-0.42

Omega Ratio

LQDT:

1.15

MATW:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

LQDT:

0.31

MATW:

-0.30

Martin Ratio

LQDT:

1.74

MATW:

-1.06

Ulcer Index

LQDT:

12.63%

MATW:

19.85%

Daily Std Dev

LQDT:

48.71%

MATW:

47.97%

Max Drawdown

LQDT:

-95.31%

MATW:

-75.27%

Current Drawdown

LQDT:

-64.19%

MATW:

-65.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LQDT:

$724.32M

MATW:

$680.02M

EPS

LQDT:

$0.79

MATW:

-$2.55

PEG Ratio

LQDT:

1.78

MATW:

1.92

PS Ratio

LQDT:

1.65

MATW:

0.40

PB Ratio

LQDT:

3.69

MATW:

1.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

LQDT:

$439.25M

MATW:

$1.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LQDT:

$195.73M

MATW:

$518.98M

EBITDA (TTM)

LQDT:

$40.96M

MATW:

$55.92M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDT achieves a -27.62% return, which is significantly lower than MATW's -20.80% return. Over the past 10 years, LQDT has outperformed MATW with an annualized return of 9.11%, while MATW has yielded a comparatively lower -6.10% annualized return.


LQDT

YTD

-27.62%

1M

-26.46%

6M

-8.60%

1Y

19.78%

3Y*

19.89%

5Y*

32.56%

10Y*

9.11%

MATW

YTD

-20.80%

1M

6.19%

6M

-26.71%

1Y

-20.98%

3Y*

-9.99%

5Y*

3.78%

10Y*

-6.10%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Liquidity Services, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQDT vs. MATW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDT is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDT is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDT is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDT is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDT is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDT is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

MATW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MATW is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MATW is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MATW is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MATW is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MATW is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MATW is 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQDT vs. MATW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Matthews International Corporation (MATW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LQDT Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is higher than the MATW Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDT and MATW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LQDT vs. MATW - Dividend Comparison

LQDT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MATW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MATW
Matthews International Corporation
4.62%3.50%2.54%2.92%2.36%2.87%2.12%1.90%1.33%0.81%1.01%0.95%

Drawdowns

LQDT vs. MATW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDT drawdown since its inception was -95.31%, which is greater than MATW's maximum drawdown of -75.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDT and MATW.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LQDT vs. MATW - Volatility Comparison

Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) has a higher volatility of 16.83% compared to Matthews International Corporation (MATW) at 11.44%. This indicates that LQDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MATW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LQDT vs. MATW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidity Services, Inc. and Matthews International Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20212022202320242025
116.38M
427.63M
(LQDT) Total Revenue
(MATW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LQDT vs. MATW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Liquidity Services, Inc. and Matthews International Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
40.8%
33.7%
(LQDT) Gross Margin
(MATW) Gross Margin
LQDT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 47.43M and revenue of 116.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.

MATW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matthews International Corporation reported a gross profit of 144.11M and revenue of 427.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.7%.

LQDT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.80M and revenue of 116.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

MATW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matthews International Corporation reported an operating income of 5.95M and revenue of 427.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.4%.

LQDT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a net income of 7.05M and revenue of 116.38M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

MATW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Matthews International Corporation reported a net income of -8.92M and revenue of 427.63M, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.