PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQDT vs. MATW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

LQDT vs. MATW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Matthews International Corporation (MATW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LQDT vs. MATW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
0.86%-6.13%87.62%22.40%-36.32%38.78%166.95%-3.40%27.22%-50.26%
MATW
Matthews International Corporation
-0.21%-1.50%-21.25%23.36%-14.50%27.72%-20.49%-3.95%-21.88%-30.53%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LQDT:

$987.27M

MATW:

$812.40M

EPS

LQDT:

$0.92

MATW:

$0.72

PE Ratio

LQDT:

33.24

MATW:

35.66

PS Ratio

LQDT:

2.08

MATW:

0.58

PB Ratio

LQDT:

4.59

MATW:

1.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

LQDT:

$475.56M

MATW:

$1.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LQDT:

$158.65M

MATW:

$469.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

LQDT:

$48.97M

MATW:

$227.64M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDT achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly higher than MATW's -0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, LQDT has outperformed MATW with an annualized return of 19.47%, while MATW has yielded a comparatively lower -4.35% annualized return.


LQDT

1D
2.65%
1M
-3.29%
YTD
0.86%
6M
11.45%
1Y
-1.42%
3Y*
32.40%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
19.47%

MATW

1D
2.58%
1M
-2.31%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
8.48%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
-7.12%
5Y*
-5.83%
10Y*
-4.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LQDT vs. MATW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDT
LQDT Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LQDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDT Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDT Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

MATW
MATW Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MATW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MATW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
MATW Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MATW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MATW Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQDT vs. MATW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) and Matthews International Corporation (MATW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LQDTMATWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.04

0.56

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.23

1.06

-0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.12

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

1.22

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.15

2.66

-2.81

LQDT vs. MATW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQDT Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the MATW Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDT and MATW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LQDTMATWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

0.56

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

-0.16

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

-0.12

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.22

-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between LQDT and MATW is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LQDT vs. MATW - Dividend Comparison

LQDT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MATW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MATW
Matthews International Corporation
3.91%3.85%4.37%2.54%2.92%2.36%2.87%2.12%1.90%1.33%0.81%1.01%

Drawdowns

LQDT vs. MATW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDT drawdown since its inception was -95.31%, which is greater than MATW's maximum drawdown of -75.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDT and MATW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LQDTMATWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.31%

-75.27%

-20.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.90%

-16.18%

-14.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.60%

-58.68%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.78%

-75.27%

+2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.16%

-56.84%

+3.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.35%

-24.53%

-37.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.39%

7.38%

+10.01%

Volatility

LQDT vs. MATW - Volatility Comparison

Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) has a higher volatility of 10.81% compared to Matthews International Corporation (MATW) at 7.71%. This indicates that LQDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MATW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LQDTMATWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.81%

7.71%

+3.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.20%

22.59%

+5.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.29%

37.79%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.11%

36.24%

+12.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.31%

36.86%

+16.45%

Financials

LQDT vs. MATW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidity Services, Inc. and Matthews International Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
121.22M
284.76M
(LQDT) Total Revenue
(MATW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LQDT vs. MATW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Liquidity Services, Inc. and Matthews International Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober0
34.0%
Portfolio components
LQDT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MATW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported a gross profit of 96.71M and revenue of 284.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.0%.

LQDT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.37M and revenue of 121.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.

MATW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported an operating income of -15.69M and revenue of 284.76M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.5%.

LQDT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a net income of 7.49M and revenue of 121.22M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.

MATW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Matthews International Corporation reported a net income of 43.63M and revenue of 284.76M, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.